• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure the blue states won’t have an issue losing the subsidies-dependent red states. I wonder where flyover country wants to get the money from to keep up their lifestyle.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So they know that Texas doesn’t have a GDP high enough to even run all their red catastrophies, right? I’m kidding, I know they don’t know. They probably also don’t know that CA would be the third largest super power if they ever let us go. Which they won’t. At all.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Californians are in an abusive relationship. Blamed for everything and not allowed to leave

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know, they are certainly close to dumb enough to sign off on it. Or, you know, we can just do it and ignore the rules since they are all so fond of that now.

    • Restaldt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      California should secede and kick off the great (terrible) balkanization of the formerly united states

      NCR & The North East republic

      Vs

      Yeehawistan

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately that would cause a Pakistan-Bangladesh situation with a country connected by airlines. Except worse because Illinois, Minnesota, Colorado, and New Mexico would be enclaves in trumpistan

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    Predictable. The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

    I suspect it’s because for this brief period of time, anyway, it’s hard for them to avoid just how HATED they and their precious golden donvict truly are. They thought they’d “win” and all the normal Americans around them would just disappear. And yet, Karens like Green continue to get confronted by normal people.

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 days ago

      The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

      Because we’ve stolen their martyrdom from them by losing.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is outrageously anecdotal but the trumpers I know were all grins on the day after until they realized we weren’t gonna just get over this and they just labeled themselves. They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

          Yeah, the Professional Left did an entire section about this and they mentioned the case where some husband is completely gobsmacked that his wife filed for divorce.

          But yeah, I’ve seen the same thing and heard about it from others. Lots of quiet interactions about how so and so is a big proponent of donvict; don’t invite him/her to {whatever social function}.

          The refrain of “yeah, but let’s just agree to disagree” - I can see why many people, especially those most at risk thanks to what they wan, are thinking: “YEAH, FUCK THAT. You just voted to harm me, and you want to act like it’s just a disagreement?”

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    About the only thing that would make me happier than to have the entire pacific west coast secede and create a sovereign nation would be for Trump to do it for us so we don’t have to fight a war over it. You want us gone? Please, show us the exit, we’ll be on our way. No takebacksies.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean… as long as California takes Colorado and New Mexico with it, I see no real issues with that. We get the economy, the nature, and the nukes.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Aren’t the nukes in Montana and the dakotas? Though I’m under the impression we also keep some silos in the rural northeast.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did not expect the distribution to be like that, especially with blue states having nearly as many as red and swing states combined. For anyone curious: Blue state nukes-4324 Red state nukes-2266 Swing state nukes-2454

          Washington really surprised me but it makes a lot of sense actually. I knew there were none at Wright patt because you learn that growing up in Dayton, they can’t risk the aliens.

          And yeah I knew albequerque is one of the most critical cities for our ability to project nuclear force and that we make and test them in New Mexico and that Colorado is home to norad command. I just had also thought there were some hidden in Appalachia in upstate New York or something or one of the other eastern mountain ranges

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Something that I learned recently makes this flag make absolutely no sense.

        The bear on the flag of The Republic of California, is extinct, and has been since the 1920s. Therefore in the Fallout universe, that bear is also extinct. None of them could have mutated into the two headed version. Where the heck did this flag come from?

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          They still would have had the original California flag; the NCR flag would have been based on it, probably to deliberately harken back to the time before the restructuring of the country into the 13 Commonwealths divided the state in two

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Carried by Florida and Louisiana.

      The United States has 4 significant maritime features: the Atlantic coast, the pacific coast, the Great Lakes (sometimes called the north coast), and the Mississippi which is a river that is able to stand next to the Amazon and Nile, but is surrounded by arable and hospitable land.

      For the Atlantic coast the major ports are largely in the northeast, florida, and Louisiana. They’d be able to build up South Carolina I’m sure, and if they need to can probably build up Alabama and Mississippi. But no real issues because they’d have Florida and New Orleans.

      The Pacific coast is California, Oregon, and Washington( with its major ports being some of the bluest cities in the country. Though the non contiguous states are both pacific, but alaska swings and is contrary and Hawaii is blue and in the middle of the ocean. That’s irrelevant though because they’re accessed by air and sea. They get nothing there snd would rely on the Panama Canal.

      The Great Lakes are a blue region. Michigan swings, as does Wisconsin, but the bluest part of Ohio aside from Columbus is the northern coastline (obviously especially Cleveland), the bluest region of Indiana is their northern coastline, and every other Great Lakes state is either blue or swing. And thanks to canals the Great Lakes allow for goods to be sent to the ocean, but it’s through the northeast so in a hostile situation Indiana and Ohio are basically landlocked. I imagine because of that Wisconsin and Michigan would go blue. It’s just too advantageous to not (similar to Kentucky and Maryland in the civil war)

      The Mississippi is where they’d thrive. Louisiana is a major hit to the blue states here, the Mississippi is one of our country’s best economic features, and they’d be getting most states that border it, which doesn’t matter because they’d also be getting the outlet. The trumpistani economy would more or less be entirely dependent on it. And blockading the Mississippi is not only an obvious thing to do if civil war, it’s something the north did in the last one

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much all in Blue states - the Red states have no pacific access and lode out on the eastern megacity.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Fucking do it already, I’m tired of the roller coaster. Let them have their MAGA utopia of Dumbfuckistan and leave the rest of us be to maybe finally start fixing things that have been broken for half a century.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m literally moving to a blue state. The one good idea she had I beat her to it. Peace idiots.