• firebyte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Carr continued: “The purpose of the rule is to avoid exactly this type of biased and partisan conduct — a licensed broadcaster using the public airwaves to exert its influence for one candidate on the eve of an election. Unless the broadcaster offered Equal Time to other qualifying campaigns.”

    Waiting for Fox News to be called out…

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Why not? What’s the difference at this point? These rules were made before the Internet existed

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          I’ll preface this by saying, I’m not arguing this is how it should be, this is just how it is.

          Freedom of speech/press takes precedence unless there is a very compelling reason to make an exception. The only reason the FCC has any power over political content on the electromagnetic spectrum is because it’s a limited resource. Therefore to keep it fair, there is an exception to freedom of speech that allows the government to regulate it.

          Those spectrum limitations do not exist on cable, therefore freedom of speech takes precedence. If Fox News wants to give trump more time than Harris (how they choose to operate their business according to freedom of speech), plenty of other channels exist on cable to give Harris time as well.