… who is benefitting more from social safety nets? Walmart or the worker?

For those who can think critically: Walmart, because they don’t pay a living wage for full-time workers

For those who can’t think critically: the worker, because they’re ‘double-dipping’ by working full-time and are putting their hand out to receive government benefits.

Some perspective.

We are talking about errors of perception measured by orders of magnitude.

Ms. Mace is indeed, a cunt.

And I don’t mean the jovial mate-ship meaning of the word in Australian vernacular.

https://archive.is/QqwRF

Trump’s malignant narcissism won’t let him be subordinate to someone else. So that idea is out.

Carr continued: “The purpose of the rule is to avoid exactly this type of biased and partisan conduct — a licensed broadcaster using the public airwaves to exert its influence for one candidate on the eve of an election. Unless the broadcaster offered Equal Time to other qualifying campaigns.”

Waiting for Fox News to be called out…

Bezos probably does give a shit about using WaPo as influence though, so whilst he might not be losing money, he’s certainly losing influence (however small that may be).

And it’s not necessarily influence over the election, but influence over Amazon’s presentation in WaPo to its readers.

If 10% of WaPo’s subscribers aren’t reading WaPo anymore, as is the implication with cancelling their subscription, then Bezos loses that influence, however small, with those people.

Can’t be. Dude’s not mellow, chill, or cool.