You must log in or register to comment.
I was awake doing my homework when I heard a huge boom right next to our house. I checked google.com because if internet broke it means something serious happened and since google answered I continued my work knowing it was nothing. Strangely whatever the big boom sound was nothing noticable happened in our neighborhood
Stay safe out there
Fuck the fake and illegal zionist state
What. The. Fuck. Biden, it’s time to put your attack dog down.
Why do you think it isn’t the other way around? I’m honestly kinda wondering if this is a case where at one point perhaps the US has Israel on a leash, but it seems like Israel now has the US on a leash.
This is why we need campaign finance reform and to repeal CU.
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/lobbying?cycle=All&ind=Q05
By that logic we should just glass Israel, it would literally be a rabid dog that needs to be put down.
Iran is the “find out” stages now. Weirdly enough Iranians actually welcome Israeli strikes. If they couldnt overthrow the brutal Islamic State regime then maybe a bit of Israeli rockets can lend a hand.
I mean it’s early to tell, but so far it is reported that those were precise attacks towards military targets. So if that’s true, that would explain that attitude from ordinary Iranians.
Islamic regime killed and tortured many civilians during the multiple peaceful protests. They’re unbelievably sadistic and evil. So when civilians aren’t involved its just a fight between two dictators
I swear Lemmy is turning anti-semitist. Clearly Israel is the good guys in this Israel vs Iran conflict and yet anything that suggests this is being down voted to hell. Isn’t that crazy?
Iran is rules by a purely evil Islamic State regime and somehow it’s not OK to enjoy their down fall?
Frankly, I’m tired of every reddit alternative being captured by these extremist bafoons.
Yeah, not considering Israel as “clearly the good guys” while they commit genocide is antisemitism.
I know this might be difficult for some people, but it is absolutely possible to be critical of both sides in a conflict. It is also possible to see it as good that Iran is containing Israel from implementing its greater Israel dreams, annexing most of the Westasia region, while condemning Irans repression against its people and the violent influence expansion targeting non Shias in Iraq and Syria.
But of course Israel and its allies try to paint things in “good” vs. “evil”. This way there needs to be no condemnation of the actions of the “good guys”, no matter how blatant crimes they are and there needs to be no consideration of the motivations of the “evil guys”, no matter how legitimate their interests are.
I know this might be difficult for some people, but it is absolutely possible to be critical of both sides in a conflict
Seems like we’re in agreement here but somehow Lemmy even when Israel is put against Iran which is straight up a comic book evil level regime Israel are the bad guys?
This logic that “X is bad and they can’t do any good things and are always in the wrong” is bigotry and prejudice i.e. anti-semitism. You can say Israel is evil and agree that Israel is in the right in this particular conflict, those two things don’t cancel each other out.
This is seriously one of the best takes I’ve seen on this situation. Most people seem to get hung up on this idea of there always being a “hero” and “villain”. Not every situation has a hero.
I’m anti-zionist, any ideology that claims someone else’s home isn’t great.
I love how at every turn the ziobots all trot out the same rhetoric.
Reddit is fully captured by ziobots. Just look at worldnews. And they’re here too now.
Who’s a good little shill? You are! You little shilly whilly.
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty:
Wiki: mixed - Additional considerations apply to the use of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). RFE/RL should be used cautiously, if at all, for reporting published from the 1950s to the early 1970s, when RFE/RL had a documented relationship with the CIA. RFE/RL may be biased in some subject areas (particularly through omission of relevant, countervailing facts), and in those areas, it should be attributed in the article body. There is no consensus as to what subject areas require attribution. The scope of topics requiring attribution of RFE/RL should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Search topics on Ground.News
https://www.rferl.org/a/several-explosions-reported-in-tehran-cause-unknown/33173678.html
