Summary

Ukraine fired US-made ATACMS missiles into Russia’s Bryansk region, marking the first time Ukraine has used these longer-range weapons to strike targets deep inside Russia.

The attack comes after the Biden administration authorized Ukraine to use these weapons against targets inside Russia.

In response, President Putin updated Russia’s nuclear doctrine, labeling aggression from non-nuclear states supported by nuclear powers as a joint attack on Russia.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I moved my car several times in the time it took for this to happen. How about approve things, fire the weapons and then wait 3 days to let everyone know?

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s blindingly obvious that Ukraine has full rights to do this and its allies have the right to support them in it.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder what the mental calculus about this is, considering that Biden knows a fucking moron is going to have to handle the fallout

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Russia says there’s going to be no peace talks without recognizing the new boundaries so, might as well carve out a big part of Russia for the Ukraine

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ukraine*. “the Ukraine” is an outdated term coined by people who never recognized Ukraine’s cultural sovereignty

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “The Ukraine” and “Kiev” were two outdated 80s terms I had to update in my head when the war started.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            one of my best friends told me in 2020 it hurt her feelings a little when people used the term. not because they hurt her feelings, but because it meant societally, our understanding of her and her family’s struggles came predominantly from people who hated them. it’s worth relearning for the people it effects.

    • calabast@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      120
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think he know Trump is going to help Russia in every way possible, so he might as well let Ukraine get since more serious hits in now while they can

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah… with ukraine already talking diplomatic peace talks, i think they’re just trying to use the next 60 days to get the best possible terms

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pretty sure Zelensky is just trying to keep a lid on Trump and appear high minded to other western governments. Then when Russia’s demands are ridiculous he can point to them and go back to fighting with more support.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        60
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think he’s delivering on his promises to the MIC to maximize the money they invested in him before Trump enters office. If he gets us wrapped up in a conflict that requires deployment of US troops, so much the better for the stockholders depending on the Federal Government to get us as involved as possible.

        Trump, while he did it for the wrong reasons, did pull the US military out of foreign wars during his first term. I imagine Raytheon and Boeing and Lockheed definitely do not want that.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump, while he did it for the wrong reasons, did pull the US military out of foreign wars during his first term.

          Lol, my dude… You do remember he also ended the nuclear agreement with Iran and then assassinated their most idolized military commander?

          The pretext of Israel’s ethnic cleansing is to rope America into a hot war with Iran. Trump is and has always been great for the mic.

          Such a bad take.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lol, my dude… You do remember he also ended the nuclear agreement with Iran and then assassinated their most idolized military commander?

            I recall, yes.

            It feels very odd to watch an American president do correct things for the wrong reasons. It’s much more familiar to watch people like Bush, Obama, and Biden doing the wrong things for reasons that aren’t provided to the public, because the narratives given around US wars are nearly always false.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              2 days ago

              feels very odd to watch an American president do correct things for the wrong reasons.

              Lol, war with Iran… A correct thing?

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                No, I’m referring to getting us out of Afghanistan and Syria specifically.

                But you’ve noted, surely, that the US does largely support war with Iran by funneling WMD’s to Israel, right? Unless you voted Green, you explicitly lent your support to it via your ballot.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  No, I’m referring to getting us out of Afghanistan and Syria specifically.

                  Oh yeah, how are the people in those two countries doing now?

                  you’ve noted, surely, that the US does largely support war with Iran by funneling WMD’s to Israel, right?

                  Yeah, it was pretty much guaranteed after the pull out from the nuclear deal…almost like elections have consequences.

                  Unless you voted Green, you explicitly lent your support to it via your ballot.

                  Lol, it’s a two party system. If you voted green you still lent your support to supporting a genocide, just in an incredibly stupid way.

                  We all pay taxes to a government supporting a genocide, some of us just don’t want it to get even worse.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Some notes, to help folks stay better informed:

    • Ukraine has been firing ATACMS into “Russia” (occupied and annexed Crimea) for a good year already, without World War 3 breaking out

    • Ukraine has its own missiles too (mostly cruise, not ballistic, but they had at least a few dozen Soviet-made “Tochka” SRBMs) and they’ve been firing those at high value targets in Russia from day one of getting invaded, it’s simply that their supplies of Tochka have almost entirely run out, and their home-grown missile industry is a big fat target for Russian attacks (despite which Ukraine produces missiles, but currently not ballistic missiles of a practically usable sort)

    • ATACMS is effective and practical, with a cluster warhead it has shown ability of taking out Russian air defense batteries (S-400 and such), which are difficult targets to attack

    • this time too, air defense failed to stop them and they caused secondary detonations at a large ammunition storage site

    • since Russia is still attempting to conquer Ukraine, now with added North Korean soldiers sent by their dictator, there continues to be plentiful ground for other countries to supply Ukraine with more advanced stuff to fire at the invaders, lest they invade more of Ukraine or start invading elsewhere

    • foreign ballistic missiles that Russia has fired into Ukraine include North Korean and Iranian missiles, so foreign-made BMs flying about is ordinary stuff in this war