• Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    EV never has to be recharged… Because it recharges on the way downhill.

    “World’s largest EV never has to be plugged in” is sufficiently click-baity without being so dumbly self contradicting

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Reminds me of some guy with a OneWheel that was saying he’d never charged his board in like a thousand miles as his daily commuter.

      He lives near the top of a mountain lift, so he takes it home and just runs on pure regen lol.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        So he’s just breaking? What a silly thing to claim. I bet he’s not even regening a lot. When i ride up a mountain until my battery is down to 40% or so and ride down i regenerate around 1% or something. It might even be in the 0.6% or something

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      More like “never has to stop working to charge”. It is novel that its charging mechanism operates as a function of doing its primary job.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not novel. I think there was a train somewhere in Africa, that transported some ore from mountain to port. On the way down with ore it charged and uphill it used charge.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Is novel for a dump truck to use this. Of course it’s not a completely new concept entirely.

        • Pulptastic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          That’s genius. Who cares if thermodynamics wins, it weighs less on the way up so works out just fine.

          Just like the example in TFA.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah I was gonna say I’m pretty sure this isn’t a single use, disposable vehicle

  • tpihkal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Back in my day we drove back and forth to work uphill, both ways, and we only lost weight because we could never afford enough Starbucks and avocado toast!

  • Bgugi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    A 600 kwh battery pack so… Rocks can roll down hill? Galaxy brain moment.

    • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Genuinely, I cannot tell what your point is. In some alternate universe, are we just rolling the rocks downhill? Don’t you think we’d already be doing that? This seems like a great use case to replace diesel trucks with ones that recharge themselves using potential energy from ore. This absolutely is a galaxy brain moment, in that it’s a very smart idea.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Probably a lot less safe (and harder to aim) if you don’t use the truck. Also unlikely they get all the way down unless you mine it in wheel shapes (increasing labor and also, luckily, danger).

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    I read the story.

    I saw the comments on the story

    I laughed at the pedantic slapfights happening in the comments.

    I came here to comment on the neat story and poke fun at the silliness, to find the same pedantic slapfights here.

    Sigh.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Very interesting use case but kind of dependant on this very specific setup? I feel like an even more efficient and low maintenance method would be like… a ramp.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Well sure but if you just dump ore onto a ramp/chute then you’re constained to high angles and material so it can’t also double as a drivable road.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    yes it does. just going by the numbers posted operating in the space it does results in a net loss of12% battery each trip.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not very smart that they waste all that energy in mechanical brakes. See my comment (the one with the picture) for a way bigger and electricity-generating ropeway, including a video of a guy less squeamish than Tom Scott riding most of the 45-minute way up.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            He literally has

            Filmed safely: https://www.tomscott.com/safe/

            in the description. Meanwhile, that fat dude from Vrchlabí jumped into a moving bucket of one that is faster, 2.5x longer, at deadly height, and his only plan of getting down safely was a mattress. He acknowledged how illegal and dangerous it is and yet publishes the video with his full name.

            Just accept it, Tom Scott was being way more cautious.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Great question.

      That is definitely one of the big caveats of BEVs over diesels. A battery on an EV can only take in so much energy. Once you hit that ceiling, the battery won’t take in any more current. Fun fact, having a super charged battery in a BEV causes all sorts of headache and can cost you performance.

      You either have to switch back to service brakes or, as you mentioned, burn off energy as heat. Not sure how they’re doing it with this truck, but on other BEV loaders which I’ve worked on, we add a hydraulic valve whose only purpose is to create flow, pressure, and subsequently heat. It basically just adds a dummy load. I suspect they tapped into the dump hydraulics and added such a valve for this truck.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It seems like an opportunity for vehicle-to-vehicle charging, putting the power gained from gravity into another vehicle.

        It would need to happen quickly and at the same time as unloading and it would have to keep enough energy to climb the hill plus a safety margin.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Till elon finds out that if he manages to cover the sun, he can charge us on sunscription

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Pretty sure its also not solar. The machine gets loaded with weight at the top of the hill, its regenerative brakes store power on the way down, it drops the load off, and the lightened machine stored enough charge to drive back up.

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    well that was unexpected

    I’m curious if the desgin team knew about it in advance

      • mEEGal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        hahaha guess it boils down to that 😂

        but I was specifically wondering if they built the vehicle with a charger and ended up never using it, to their own surprise. or if they knew they’d (almost) never have to charge it

        • Venicon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          Must have a cable somewhere as a backup otherwise you’d need a full battery replacement should it ever be discharged.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Gonna go ahead and guess that when designing a 110 ton mega dump truck things are probably pretty front loaded on the planning side of things.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      It is very obvious they meant it draws no power from the grid. And it doesn’t, indeed, acting fully autonomously.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I don’t really care what they meant. They’re being deliberately ambiguous for clicks.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I cannot avoid to be pedantic on this, it is recharged during half the trip… it just does not require plug-like recharging

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Yeah another clickbait headline. It’s getting recharged all the time, it’s just very lucky to be in a use case where it goes down hills with large loads all the time

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s more than a clickbait headline, the first paragraph is just flat out wrong:

        Perhaps best of all, it consumes no energy doing it.

        Obviously it’s consuming energy going uphill. Just because the power source is gravity doesn’t mean it’s not consuming energy.