• voxel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      fortnite’s kinda trying to pull off roblox tho, like their minigames are fullh scriptable in UE4

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        They’re trying to do every type of game and act like Fortnite is it’s own OS/device, in a sense. It has racing, it has Lego, it has building, it has guitar hero

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      They tried to do a themed Among Us game, but when they removed the ability of crewmates to criticize each others’ votes it just made the imposters win every round

      e; That was a joke (probably should be obvious, but I’m not trying to spread disinformation out here)

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 days ago

    I don’t play fortnite and I tend to like experimental media. The article has once reviewer calling the map “more thoughtful than expected”, and I’m also getting the sense that no-gun maps aren’t anything new.

    I still think it’s not as weird and terrible as the click-hungry legacy media has been inviting us to find it. It’s a genuine seeming effort to reach younger people less likely to vote or read about policy ideas. It’s just a shame it didn’t catch on much.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Oh no, my shooty game has a vote map where I can’t kill supporters there. This is not freedom! Yeah its dumb, but it makes sense its not a real fortnite map that you play on.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      More than a few high profile anti-gun people have owned firearms. Diane Feinstein comes to mind as another example.

      ALL of the super wealthy anti-gun people, like Michael Bloomberg, have no issue being protected by people with firearms.

      It’s not the guns that they’re against. They’re against them being owned by peasants regular people.