Investigators in Oregon searching for the person responsible for three fires at ballot drop boxes in the past few weeks – which damaged hundreds of ballots – believe “it is very possible the suspect intends to continue the attacks,” a police spokesperson said Wednesday.

Portland Police Bureau spokesperson Mike Benner described the suspect as a White man between 30 and 40 years old, who is balding or has very short hair. The man has a medium to thin build, he said.

Fires were set at three ballot boxes in the area in the past three weeks. Officials have identified 488 damaged ballots that were retrieved from a burned ballot box in Vancouver, Washington, and 345 of those voters already requested new ballots, according to election officials. Elections staff will mail another 143 replacement ballots to voters Thursday, officials said on X.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 days ago

    This is the kind of person who gets caught while people like Trump never get punished for instigating the mob.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 days ago
    CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for CNN:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that news broadcast or published by CNN is generally reliable. However, iReport consists solely of user-generated content, and talk show content should be treated as opinion pieces. Some editors consider CNN biased, though not to the extent that it affects reliability.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/us/washington-oregon-ballot-box-fires/index.html

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Re: the headline

    No they didn’t.

    “In terms of anticipating future behavior, that’s a speculation,” the chief said. “That’s just what we have to anticipate. It would be really naive of us or unjust for us to say that ‘hey, it’s all taken care of,’ and we don’t have him in custody.”

    They are planning for future attacks because it would absolutely stupid and a failure of their duties to not, but nowhere in that article are they quoted as saying they think he will.

    That might not seem like an actual distinction, but to claim they think he will act again implies they have some material insight and can discourage voters even further from attempting to use drop boxes; conversely, to claim they are anticipating future attacks does not imply any material insight and if anticipation is followed with increased security can help to assuage voters’ fears.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 days ago

      Also, while this individual is clearly unhinged and stupid, it would be insanely stupid to try and pull it off again with all of the scrutiny.

      I hope this fucker tries and gets caught in the act.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      They probably do, though. One of ‘em called their cousin Vern and told him to knock it off-making ‘em look bad, an’all

      • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Cousin? Feels like they were describing the guy as balding and one of their guys in the back said:“it’s just short” trying to defend themselves. (This is how that line felt, and I thought it something from an 80s cop comedy)