• Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s using every brain cell he has to not find out a gay anthem isn’t a gay anthem because the entire writing staff is entirely gay and wrote the song for gay men explicitly, but because gay people use it as an anthem.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Iconic EDM group Kernkraft 400 has denied their hit single Zombie Nation is a sporting anthem. “It’s not played at sporting events. It just isn’t.”


    News from a fever dream.

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 day ago

    The more I read the funnier it gets

    As for the idea that “Y.M.C.A. is “somehow a gay anthem,” Willis said that “is a false assumption based on the fact that my writing partner was gay, and some (not all) of Village People were gay, and that the first Village People album was totally about gay

    “This assumption is also based on the fact that the YMCA was apparently being used as some sort of gay hangout and since one of the writers was gay and some of the Village People are gay, the song must be a message to gay people. To that I say once again, get your minds out of the gutter. It is not.

    I therefore wrote ‘Y.M.C.A.’ about the things I knew about the Y in the urban areas of San Francisco such as swimming, basketball, track, and cheap food and cheap rooms. And when I say, “hang out with all the boys” that is simply 1970s black slang for black guys hanging-out together for sports, gambling or whatever. There’s nothing gay about that.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      124
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “As a straight member of a gay band, I totally didn’t get the point of the gay song I wrote for my gay band”

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I can reluctantly believe that is true (despite the laughable first paragraph where he gives example after example about why such “assumptions” are reasonable) - but he’s old enough to know that once an artist puts art out into the world, their interpretation of it is no longer the only one.

      The song IS a gay anthem even if it wasn’t written that way.

      edit - they the

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      1 day ago

      I hate him saying “get your mind out of the gutter” as if even thinking about people who are gay is itself a perverted sexual act.

      Gay people exist. Acknowledging this and discussing whether a piece of media is directed at them is not “mind in gutter” stuff.

      I don’t want to go so far as to say this person is homophobic, but it sure does sound like some internalized homophobia, perhaps.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, the title and situation is a lot more straightforward than the nuance behind his reasoning and the history of the band.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Offering young men ways to have a good time when they’re short on their dough sure as hell doesn’t sound straight.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’ll come to find many people you would have never suspected are OK with fascism, when it makes them rich.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Damn, that was a compelling read. When I clicked on the link and saw it was from 1941, I felt a grim resolve to read it in full, because when people post decades old pieces on fascism, it always hits hard (like that Sartre bit about antisemitism that gets shared quite often).

          Reading through this piece was a curious feeling, because I was wondering which of the people at this party I might be. Certainly not Mr A, because I am descended from no-one great. I certainly didn’t go to the same school as any Mr A, so I’m also not Mr B. With a certain sense of dread, I considered that maybe I’m Mr C, given that I also started out very poor and worked my way up to where I am (I’m the first in my family to go to university, for example). I concluded that whereas Mr C’s battle against class has left him cold and hard, I have found myself becoming warmer as the years go on.

          I was thinking like this throughout most of the piece, perversely waiting for someone I will never meet to tell me whether or not I’m the kind of person who becomes a Nazi. In the end, none of the archetypes described seem to fit me. It turns out that although fascism today functions remarkably similarly to how it did then, the world itself is different enough that the archetypes today don’t map onto the past.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        44
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes it’s very mature and reasonable to call everyone a fascist. You’re doing the right thing here.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t see anyone who’s calling everyone a fascist.

          But you know what you call someone who carries water for fascists? A fascist.

        • MataVatnik@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          A man who supported the Nazi party because he just wanted better highways is still considered a fascist

  • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, Trump hate aside, I personally never thought of the song as gay. It has certainly such a wide appeal that it can be thought of as just a party song, surpassing whatever context may have provided inspiration for it. But reading the statement, I have to say that was a lot of words just to say it isn’t gay lol. And saying my wife will sue you for claiming something I wrote was gay sounds even sillier and like he’s trying to compensate for something.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Plausible deniability went out the window for me after I learned the album is called Cruisin’

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing is, you’re looking at it from 2024 eyes. 46 years ago, it was very definitely a gay video, especially when you throw in things that have been forgotten like the 1970’s gay mustache. It wasn’t really until Magnum PI that straight men reclaimed the mustache.

      • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I should have mentioned, I tried to avoid conflating the costumes of the non-homophobic members with the message of the song, and it still seemed fairly gay. Particularly when they stood in front of a building with “ramrod” emblazoned across its front and sides.

    • DavidGA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a boykisser, I can assure you that we’re rejecting it at high speed.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m kind of surprised that the YMCA dance wasn’t in the YMCA music video. I had always assumed that would have been where it started. I guess the dance came after.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    WOW! Not much in the news has shocked and surprised me as much as this article has.

    Victor Willis says he will take legal action against any news organization that suggest “Y.M.C.A.” is a gay anthem beginning in January 2025

    I’m really curious to know what legal action he intends to take. Doesn’t he have to show some sort of damages for any hope of not throwing his money away on frivolous lawsuits that will go nowhere?

  • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not a gay anthem, it’s only coincidence that it’s played in nearly every gay pub I have been to, on every gay radio station, every gay pride event (with performers), and when my first boyfriend sucked my dick. People just like picking straws, man.