• MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    Friendly Reminder: You can install any KDE based Linux distribution and probably have an equivalent or better experience with security and regular steam updates.

    Compatibility isn’t really an excuse in this case, as Windows 7/8 will no longer be compatible with the most troubling games anyway. You’d be best off on a modern system with proper security patches.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 days ago

      Personally, I dislike that Nobara is relying on patched Mesa and kernel versions. This is unnecessary risk of instability. AFAIK Bazzite doesn’t do that.

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 days ago

      Sytems that don’t receive security patches anymore well deserve that title. You’d hardly keep it airgapped if you care about Steam updates.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        Something that came out last week can be considered ancient in tech terms.

          • falidorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            18 days ago

            We don’t call 15 year old cars ancient. Blu rays aren’t ancient. CDs aren’t ancient. Tons of things are 15 years old and fallen out of general use but aren’t considered ancient.

            I’d argue that XP is ancient but not Win7.

            • colderr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              18 days ago

              Blu rays and CDs are considered ancient. Considering all the storage we have now, something like a CD is close to worthless for almost everyone. Blu rays could have their own niche still, but it’s still considered ancient by modern standards. Technology evolves so fast, and it’s hard to keep up.

              • falidorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                I call shenanigans. Blu rays still make up most of physical sales and that video quality makes up the most consumed resolution.

                I can kinda see the argument for CDs but they are still sold new in big name B&M stores. “Close to worthless” is hyperbole at the very least.

            • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              18 days ago

              Cars have an expected lifespan of like 20 years, operating systems don’t.

              Windows 7 came out with very early support for efi boot which took explicit effort to get to work. At this point most OEM machines out there don’t even support the legacy booting mode. That is ancient by tech standards.

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Tell that to the MS Dos PCs I regularly have to maintain and provide safety to. They still live.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Something can be ancient and still function for purpose. We’ve uncovered ancient pottery intact.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Ancient… ME is ancient, XP is old, 7 is almost old (you still see it here and there).

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        And yet it is just fine for your banking institutions, and a surprising amount of government machines.

        I think it is just lovely on my media PC in my living room.

        • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          That’s because those banking institutions have enterprise level support that they pay for yearly from Microsoft.

          You do not.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Funny enough, no they don’t all have enterprise level support from Microsoft. Hell the ones that do don’t use it, at the scale you are talking about you likely have the same or better support internally.

            I don’t understand why you think that you can even get Microsoft support for 7 at this point?

            • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Businesses, especially banks, have different rules. Banks are still getting security updates for their systems running Windows XP (generally ATMs).

              A bank isn’t some run of the mill business and banks always have special relationships with Microsoft.

                • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Yes, they do. Ffs, your claims are ridiculous.

                  Read and learn something for a change:

                  Banks and other institutions that use Windows XP often do so under specialized agreements with Microsoft, called Custom Support Agreements (CSAs) or Custom Extended Support Agreements (CESAs). These agreements allow organizations to continue receiving critical security updates for their legacy systems even after official support has ended. Here’s how these agreements work:

                  1. Custom Support Agreements (CSAs)

                  After Windows XP’s official support ended in April 2014, Microsoft offered CSAs to organizations that could not immediately migrate to newer operating systems due to compatibility, cost, or operational constraints.

                  Under a CSA, Microsoft continues to provide critical security updates specifically tailored to the organization’s systems.

                  These agreements are typically very expensive and are meant as a temporary measure while the organization transitions to a supported platform.

                  1. Why Banks Use CSAs

                  Legacy Systems: Many ATMs and banking software were originally built to run on Windows XP, and updating to newer systems can be complex and costly due to hardware and software dependencies.

                  Security Needs: Despite using outdated systems, banks must maintain a high level of security. The CSA ensures critical vulnerabilities are patched.

                  Regulatory Compliance: Financial institutions are heavily regulated and need to meet strict security standards. Extended support agreements help them avoid compliance violations.

                  1. Custom Patching and Support

                  Microsoft provides patches only for the most critical vulnerabilities that could severely impact the organization.

                  These updates are not made available to the general public, ensuring that only organizations with a CSA receive them.

                  1. Cost

                  The cost of a CSA is high and increases annually to encourage organizations to migrate to supported platforms.

                  Some estimates suggest costs in the range of $1,000 to $5,000 per device per year, depending on the scale and specifics of the agreement.

                  1. Alternatives Banks Might Use

                  Some banks have begun moving away from Windows XP entirely, often transitioning to supported operating systems like Windows 10 or Windows Embedded systems.

                  They may also use virtualized environments to maintain compatibility with older applications without relying on outdated OS versions directly.

                  These agreements allow banks and other critical industries to maintain operations securely while planning their eventual migration to modern systems. However, this is a stopgap solution and not a permanent fix, as the long-term risks and costs of relying on unsupported software grow over time.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 days ago

              Not sure what you mean, but I’ve never seen a banking or government machine that was raw-dogging the internet.
              They’re behind a firewall, a web filter, a content deconstructor, a hyperlink sandbox and an endpoint protection where processes need to be white-listed to run.

              In such a setting, it may be safe to still run Windows 7 for some tasks, but it won’t be for browsing and email.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Not sure how its done in your country, but there are very much windows 7 machines here “raw dogging” the internet. Its more about risk management then anything.

                I mean we are in a world where right now the security solutions are worse then the risk of attack. Right now attacks are done mainly with social engineering and the new systems make bonzi buddy look tame.

                There is little point punishing my self by changing my windows 7 machine that I like just so that I can change out old vulnerabilities with new ones. I swear software fear mongering runs half the industry right now on nothing other then inertia.