• Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Win 10 was definitely an improvement over 8. I’d even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp. Of course now 10 has been fully enshitified but it used to be good.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would agree that 10 was very good, but i could say similar things about windows 11 which in many ways performs better then 10.

      And yet its shortly after upgrading to 11 that i switched to linux to never look back.

      I think part of the logic in this meme is that it doesn’t matter how good the basic functions of the operating system are but what does is the design philosophy of the company. Loyalty in other systems decreased while Loyalty in windows gained.

      Microsoft force feeding edge, onedrive, burrying the local account option till after the install with Microsoft account.

      Randomly finding an update put a second weather widget on my taskbar that shows a different weather then the one in start. Taskbar icons that cant be closed, only hidden.

      These things don’t affect the OS functionality in a big deal but its like i was in an abusive relationship that i finally got out of. No matter how much sweet talking and promises to do better i am not going back.

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’d even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp

      How can you so batantly skip over Win 7? I’ve heard some argue 10 was better (it wasn’t) but that 7 >> XP was pretty undisputed.

      All three are shit compared to Linux, of course (Arch btw).

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      8 wasn’t nearly as bad as people think, and there were big improvements to the kernel that make it a definite improvement over 7.

      The problem for most people was the Start screen, which if you could get past, left you with what was a really good OS.

      Less ads and telemetry than 10, too.

  • thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What’s so bad about win 11 as an OS? For me it’s the most stable windows. Of course the MS crap they want you to include is bs, but that’s not really the OS

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Rule of thumb: If it’s included with an install where you’re clicking through the defaults, to the average user the distinction doesn’t matter, it’s part of the OS

    • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s part of the OS? All of the telemetry, ads, and strange news thingy is a standard part of the OS - if you try to remove it, it’ll just get back with any updates.

      So it is really the OS

      it’s the same way ubuntu bad now, forcing snaps

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So what you’re saying is that there has only ever been one Mac OS and one Linux OS?

    How about adding some distros?

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The colouring is shit, MacOS turns red at its peak. So, was it good or bad at that moment?

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Easy to have a constant upward trend when you start off in your parents basement…

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only thing I disagree with here is Win8 being apparently better than Win10.

    Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen, and while Win8.1 did help, Win10 was by far the better implementation of PC Metro IMO.

    Having said that, Win11 is exactly where it needs to be. It’s all of Win10’s worst traits cranked up to 11 with a heaping of it’s own bullshit and spyware on top

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen

      So many people say that but I actually liked the menu. It opened very fast and you could far more quickly find and hit the right tile than that stupid nested programs tree that was the norm in the start menus of earlier Windows versions.

      I’d say considering that telemetry started to creep in primarily with Win 10, 8 was indeed better (meaning less bad).

      • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Personally, I felt like Win8 was an over correction in favor of touch screens vs Win7. Win8.1 was kind of the sweet spot for getting touch screen functionality into Windows while maintaining a consistent UI between tablets, laptops, and desktops. So much so that I would consider it to be separate point on the chart between 8 and 10.

        Win10 did improve the UI a bit over that, but was so much of a step backwards in basically every other regard that I do consider that the point at which Windows started trending consistently downwards. As in, Win10 should be lower then Win7 on that curve, with Win11 lower than that, and no real hope that any future updates or versions will ever improve anything.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Windows 10 should be a dead cat bounce on this chart. Better than 8, worse than 7, better than 11 by a lot.

  • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This implies that Linux is rising but still worse than the worst windows os 🫣🫠🫤😴🤧🤮🥴

      • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I feel like they should cross. For a long time Linux really was “worse” than Windows in the sense that you needed some computer knowledge and deal with incompatibilities with the OS that most people were using; both have gotten better in recent years and Windows has gotten worse, so for some use cases i’d say we could be at the point that the lines cross.

        Written from my Mint laptop, absolutely perfect but i’ve only used it for internet and office so nothing fancy

        • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          Yup. For me it similar. I was getting frustrated with the lack of customization in Win11, while at the same time seeing that Linux is actually viable for me with the Steam Deck.

          I’ve been running Linux for a year now and while it was good enough for me to switch back then, it’s incredible how much better it has gotten since then.

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Linux is so bad it’s worse than everything else even when others are enshittifying aggressively? Got it!

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Windows Vista was better than 8 and 10, a lot of legacy devices in industry kept extended Vista support for years and years.

    • Blackout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The software I run a 8 figure business with only works in windows and macs. Not a specific title but the software for an entire industry. Linux is nice but still a novelty in my world.

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Same. Until Linux is supported by scada systems it will only be a service, non-hmi OS, in my world.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The sad part is a lot of modern SCADAs and DCSs are migrating or have already migrated to HTML, but using Microsoft technologies as core. 🤦‍♂️

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What software is that? Is it something with a really heavy desktop client by nature (e.g CAD, video editing), or could it instead have a browser-based frontend?

        • Blackout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, CAD/CAM stuff like Catia, SW, mastercam, etc. It will take a lot of market share improvements to convince the developers to bother with a port. I’m no M$ fanboy, just no real production alternative.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So much grief caused by the widespread move from Unix to Windows in the industry sector. The Unix dwarves grew too greedy, their hardware platforms too niche… they unleashed the beast from the depths. An IBM-PC so powerful, it quashed their empires!

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I reckon they might be using a lot of Windows specific libraries, making any porting a real pain in the ass. And when you’re in that space, unfortunately people just have to choose the OS that goes with their applications, not the other way around.

            It’s literally easier to start an entirely new CAD/CAM project and make that cross-platform. Unfortunately, that’s a 7 or 8 figure proposition to get started as well (probably 8 for a polished product that can pull proper market share).

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Linux isn’t an upward curve, either. It mostly is, but those krackle-pops have to put a dent in the curve.