Nov 19 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden has approved provision of anti-personnel land mines to Ukraine, a U.S. official told Reuters, a step that could help slow Russian advances in its east, especially when used along with other munitions from the United States.

The United States expects Ukraine to use the mines in its own territory, though it has committed not to use them in areas populated with its own civilians, the official said. The Washington Post first reported the development.

The office of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the Ukrainian defence ministry, the Russian defence ministry and the Kremlin did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests to comment.

The United States has provided Ukraine with anti-tank mines throughout its war with Russia, but the addition of anti-personnel mines aims at blunting the advance of Russian ground troops, the official added, speaking on condition of anonymity.

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sub human scum.

    The 1997 Ottawa Treaty banned the use of Land mine.

    164 countries signed it.

    The USA joined Russia, India and China in not signing it.

    People who proliferate land mines will burn in hell fire.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Textbook whataboutism. Are you aware that two wrongs do NOT in fact make a right? And that crimes against humanity don’t cease to be criminal atrocities because someone did them to you first?

        In other words: are you ignorant, a hypocrite, or an ignorant hypocrite when it comes to the victims of war crimes committing war crimes?

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Working to ban something means it’s a crime against humanity. Great. Alright.

              • dwalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Thats how crimes against humanity work. People find it so abhorrent they sign a treaty.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                No. Got the order wrong. People are working to ban them because they’re atrocious. They’re not atrocious because people are working to ban them. Don’t pretend to be even more obtuse than you already are.

                They’re atrocious because they can make areas dangerous for anyone to traverse for years if not decades, blowing the limbs off of innocent civilians or making large swaths of land uninhabitable and unavailable to farm without risking death and dismemberment.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  They’re atrocious because they can make areas dangerous for anyone to traverse for years if not decades, blowing the limbs off of innocent civilians or making large swaths of land uninhabitable and unavailable to farm without risking death and dismemberment.

                  So like all UXO that’s indiscriminately used?

                  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Yes. “Indiscriminately” being the operative word.

                    Russians butchering civilians doesn’t make it ok for Ukraine to emulate them.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Two wrongs don’t make a right, but if you die it doesn’t matter if you were wrong or right.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        or how about this, both of them are terrible for this. i strongly support Ukraine’s right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit? i sure fucking hope not.

        grow a spine and actually believe in something for yourself. landmines are wrong, no matter who uses them or why they are used.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          i strongly support Ukraine’s right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit?

          This may be shocking, but landmines and bioweapons are not even close to equivalent.

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            i didn’t say they were equivalent, i said they’re both blights that remain in the past. terrible things that cause mass civilian casualties for decades after the conflict.

            one can still be worse than the other, but anyone that uses them should be punished.