She has famously had an abysmal approval rate nationwide, but she gets more votes than her opponents so she gets to keep her seat.

Like Mitch McConnell, MTG, Lauren Boebert, or Matt Gaetz.

Ignorant would be the better word.

No one is entirely good or entirely evil.

Your typo confused the hell out of me.

Turns out if you rush people for no reason, a lot of shitty, half-baked decisions have to be made.

Accountability starts at the top. If these officers are guilty of treason, so is Trump.

Anarchists are not known for acknowledging the benefits of government regulation.

You still interact with other people in person, and one or more of them interacts with the public.

If you learned nothing else from CoViD-19 I would hope you at least learned that you are only a couple degrees of separation from a hotbed of infection at most.

You a fed or something?

Chat, is Elon cooked? No cap?

You’ll still roll without air. Air has a negligible, if anything negative, impact on rolling.

40% of people are voting to divert the meteor and 40% are voting to accelerate it towards us…

Hmmm… I vote we change the moon’s orbit a bit. I’m a single-issue voter and neither plan really addresses the moon very well.

That’s understandable and not implied by the comic, so you’re not targeted by my joke.

I hear the meteor has a lot of palladium, which should help our economy.

A vote for a third party under FPTP is mathematically a vote against the party closest to your values. If you live in the US, that means you vote(d) against the Democratic Party and for the Republican Party.

I too long for a third party, but 2024 is not the time.

Imagine if you could vote to stop the meteor but choose to stay home and read the comics instead.

You seem to agree and disagree with me in the same comment.

Every human being is capable of change. Hitler was even capable of change; he killed himself when he realized he lost.

Yep. Most successful strategy with an opponent who can’t or won’t discuss terms is simply to retaliate as often as they betray you.

I don’t know how to help you. You changed the conditions of the hypothetical and are now puffing your chest out, defending your conclusions from it.

Just drop another line about your CV and peace out.

You made a pretty significant reading error and you’re trying to say other people don’t read well.

That’s hilarious.

The scenario at hand isn’t US Civil War 2. Pay better attention to reading next time so you don’t waste everyone’s time.