A notice from X (formerly Twitter) stating: 'Block is changing soon. If your posts are set to public, accounts you have blocked will be able to view them, but they will not be able to engage. For more control over who can see your posts, you can still protect your account.' There is an 'OK' button at the bottom of the notice.

  • X is telling users that blocking will soon be useless and trolls and stalkers will soon be able to see their posts again.
  • Instead of blocking, X advises that users take their account private, the antithesis to what X and its progenitor Twitter was about.
  • This removal of blocking may violate Apple and Google’s policies regarding platforms that host user generated content.
        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 month ago

          I can no longer see posts made on a Mastodon instance ran by an ableist piece of shit after I called her an ableist piece of shit, so even Mastodon has this feature.

        • barcaxavi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is the first time I’m exploring this, but I think you’re wrong.

          On Mastodon you can:

          So post visibility is not something you set per profile, but per post. But you have an effective tool to decide who you let in AND remove on the way.

          • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think it theoretically can’t be done. The protocol allows anyone to query for posts, and it has to work that way unless you want to move ActivityPub federation to an invite-only system. On most servers I think browsing while being logged out is sufficient, just like on pre-Musk Twitter.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          The block feature works on Mastodon as it does most places. Lemmy seems to be the only weird place where blocking isn’t a fully-featured option.

      • zante@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right, but you’re smart enough to know it’s the right thing to do. Many aren’t , sadly.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Every time someone makes a blanket demand like ‘everyone just get off Twitter,’ and I ask why I should, the answer is more or less: ‘I don’t like Elon, so I don’t want anyone using his platform.’

          I’ve yet to figure out why I should care how somebody else feels about what I do online. I don’t like TikTok either yet I don’t go around telling people to get off the platform.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Having an X account is in no way, shape, or form a necessity. Imagine thinking you need to participate in the toxic, mainstream socialsphere.

  • Vaggumon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I protected myself by deleting Twitter the day douche nozzle took over because I’m not a fucking moron.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Instead of blocking, X advises that users take their account private, the antithesis to what X and its progenitor Twitter was about.

    so basically remove your voice from the public sphere, giving the platform fully to the trolls and bullies.

    This will also majorly affect professionals who must use twitter publicly for their job. Reporters, artists, PR people, etc. - they have all had to block abusive users over the years, so I think this may finally push them away to other platforms.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not to mention the change that makes it no longer possible to opt out of being used for AI training. A lot of artists are now jumping ship to blue sky.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      This will also majorly affect professionals who must use twitter publicly for their job. Reporters, artists, PR people, etc.

      You either gonna regime whore or you ain’t got a job… Telling you when they killed tupac and biggie that was about the beginning of the end and now we here🤡

      Get an OF account ?

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s the same way it works on the fediverse. You post something publicly and anyone can see it regardless of whether you block them or not.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah but this is musk and we hate him so this is obviously a very bad terrible idea and omg how can anyone still be on Twitter after this…but don’t mind that I’m posting this on a site where the block does even less.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    So even after this update, the block feature on Twitter is still more effective than it is on Lemmy, yet nobody seems to be complaining about that.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Blocking on Lemmy does nothing else but hide that user’s posts and messages from you

          • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Hide you from the view of anyone you block. Essentially, when you block someone, they should automatically be forced to block you as well.

            Block on Lemmy, and now Twitter, works like it used to on Reddit few years back, and the main criticism and massive issue with is that because it’s just a mute/hide, you can’t see what they post and they can keep commenting on your posts with whatever they want. It was huge issue on Reddit where assholes kept following users and commenting slander and falsehoods to every single post or comment they made.
            Everyone else sees all of those comments as the first reply, but you are blissfully ignorant of them.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is…that not what’s supposed to happen?

          I don’t have any other socials so I’m not too up on what the standards are.

          • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            Technically, it’s ‘mute,’ not ‘block.’ In most cases, blocking not only prevents you from seeing their content but also them from seeing yours.

            What Twitter is being criticized for here is changing blocking to work similarly to how it does on Lemmy, with the exception that you still couldn’t engage with content from users who have blocked you, whereas on Lemmy, you can.

            It’s being argued that ‘weakening’ the block feature in this way makes stalking and harassment easier.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is that a problem? You could already just view their posts without an account, or create a burner account. Might be a hot take, but I think someone with a public account shouldn’t expect to be able to hide it from specific people.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think Twitter lets you view posts without being logged in anymore. Or at least, it’ll show you old posts, only.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        You may be right, seems like it only shows you posts by number of likes. But a burner account is nearly effortless to create anyways.

        • vzq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, yes. But:

          1. Nearly effortless is not the same as effortless
          2. it’s more evidence that X caters more to the blockees than the blockers.
          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            it’s more evidence that X caters more to the blockees than the blockers.

            I’m not sure I agree. However, even if it’s true, I’m not sure it’s such a bad thing. If you’re saying something in public and I’m not even allowed to hear it, let alone respond to it, because you blocked me, you have an effective tool to shut down any dissent. This is what I saw on reddit all the time, there were posters who would block anyone who disagreed with them and so the comments sections on their posts would become very skewed.

            And just the other day, I said that David Duke endorsing Jill Stein doesn’t mean Jill Stein approves of David Duke or anything he stands for. Someone accused me of defending David Duke, and when I pointed out that his was fantasy, they blocked me. So I see people blocking for bullshit reasons all the time.

            Lemmy is much the same, even less restrictive because you don’t even have to log in to see anything. It’s better this way.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Not interested in the format even when it was still Twitter.

                But “go away” is a good counter and you’ve got me convinced. You’re truly adding to the high level discourse here.

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There is nothing behind those eyes. Looks like an empty vessel with an over soaked ketamine brain.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It really comes down to feature removal. Elon annihilated Twitter’s staff, and the more features they can cut, the less staff they need. It may not seem like much to maintain a block feature, and if you have a staff, it’s not. But you do need to have probably some sort of blocker backend service, a blocking UI, probably an unblocking UI (I dunno if that’s a thing I don’t use twitter), storage that keeps track of who blocked who, and somebody who knows how all that works.