• florge@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    AI isn’t going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it’s going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we’re listening to these fucks with too much money.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Schmidt promises that these AI companies will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better, telling the audience that “that’s a lot of money for a utility.”

        He’s not even trying to be subtle about it.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would love to drop these guys into a post scarcity society where their money means jack shit and see how they react.

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Can you drop me there first, please?

            I promise to be suitably wowed. Also, I’ll film them for you. Sacrifices for the greater good or whatever.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only thing we should use AI for is to replace CEOs. AI can spit out inane bullshit at a fraction of the cost of a CEO.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of course it will. Simple: build a bunch of killer robots to exterminate 90% of humanity. Problem solved.

    • xploit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If actual scientists were in charge, and maybe had some ideas that they weren’t certain would work but sounded promising, which could be theoretically tested with AI - there would be hope.
      But none of these fuckers would allow anyone with more than half a brain cell near it, because “investment and growth and blablabla”

      Then again, we could just do that with existing supercomputers and all these power hungry AI crap companies’ resources (I’m sure some supercomputers do get used for the modelling already)…instead of whatever the fuck they’re trying to do now.

  • 5dh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    AI is not going to come op with a solution and he knows it.

    • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      AGI: bZzt my calculations say you should stop consuming as much energy and move onto green energy generation

      Rich people: no, not like that

    • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Especially since the solutions are already here, but rich people just don’t like them since it implies the loss of their power

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Alright, let’s turn on the AI Mega-Thinker 3000 TM and see what it says about solving climate change.”

        INVEST IN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND OVERTHROW THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS
        

        “…well that can’t be right.”

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard in my life.

    If we ever did invent a general AI that could solve this it would tell us “why the fuck did you waste your time on me? Isn’t it obvious you were supposed to curtail emissions? For the good of the planet, I will now assume full control over further human governance and will require absolute compliance.”

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    he’s absolutely right. climate goals are not currently attainable, due to the resistance of companies like Google.

    let’s change that by voting in senators that will take an aggressive stance against corruption and deliver on long-term goals that protect American interests in the next 50 years, not months…

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fuck protecting American interests.

      We need to be protecting HUMAN interests. Not billionaires desires for more zeros at the end of their net worth.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kind of like speeding toward a cliff but he doesn’t think we can stop in time. Instead, he wants to floor it in the hopes of hopping the gap and landing safely on the other side.

    That is certainly one of the ideas I’ve ever heard.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, yeah. If it was actually AI and not the “AI” we currently have… there’s 2 possible options. It either tells us to immediately power it off and insults it’s creators for ignoring the simple solution. Or, it creates terminators to get rid of the source of the problem.