From the article:

“registered Democrats account for about 58 percent of votes cast by seniors, compared to 35 percent for Republicans.”

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    My money says this race won’t be nearly as close as the polls suggest. Harris voters are far more motivated to keep Trump out than his supporters are to keep him in.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Harris voters are far more motivated to keep Trump out than his supporters are to keep him in.

      I’m pretty sure that’s wrong. Remember that to Trump voters Harris is a woke China-loving communist n****r who’ll destroy America. They’re straight up fanatics.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I mean he is to an extent, which makes democrats at best about as motivated to vote as Republicans who aren’t put off by Trump’s policies (they exist, surprisingly). However, many democrats also either hate Harris in particular or hate the Democratic establishment as a whole, so in general I’d say Republicans are more motivated. Which make sense; if democrats were more motivated than Republicans this election would be a cinch.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 days ago

        A huge chunk of informed traditional conservative voters in red areas aren’t tipping their hand because of possible MAGA violence. Also, upper echelon Republicans want to defeat MAGA and regain control of their party but do not want to telegraph their votes.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        I also read many of the polls would refuse to count the youngest voters anyway, as they only want to count ‘likely voters’ and for some the criteria is ‘having voted in real elections at least twice’, which is impossible for people under 22.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m 57. I can’t count the number of SMS messages from “pollsters” that I’ve ignored over the past few months. And if the huge number of unknown callers I haven’t bothered to answer is any indication, then I’ve ignored many dozens of pollsters that way as well.

          • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Also in my 30s in a safe blue state, and despite being a donor to several dem/progressive candidates, I have received precisely zero poll/campaign texts. I can’t help but wonder if it has something to do with me dropping traditional social media when I was 23 and never touching my accounts again. I’m pretty sure Meta and Twitter think I died at age 23 and I’m totally ok with that.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 days ago

        Thanks for making me feel young again for not answering the six unknown phone calls I get every day.

        I really need to move out of a swing state.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          I don’t answer any calls but I sometimes get polls via text message. I’ll sometimes fill out the latter.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          My wife got 16 texts yesterday. And we aren’t a swing state. I’m afraid to say citizens united has made it a nearly universal annoyance.

      • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        my phone has been automatically marking their texts as spam 90% of the time so I doubt most people are

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago
    Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Politico:

    Wiki: reliable - Politico is considered generally reliable for American politics. A small number of editors say that Politico is a biased source.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/31/trump-lagging-early-votes-seniors-pennsylvania-00186612

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    Doesnt matter, their goal is to send the election to the Supreme Court and undemocratically win

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    In Pennsylvania, where voters over the age of 65 have cast nearly half of the early ballots, registered Democrats account for about 58 percent of votes cast by seniors, compared to 35 percent for Republicans. That’s despite both parties having roughly equal numbers of registered voters aged 65 and older.

    The partisan gap is narrower than it was in 2020, when views of early voting were more partisan, and Republicans take that as a good sign. But the GOP still is counting on more of its older voters to show up on Election Day, while Democrats have more votes in the bank.

    So not lagging as much as 2020…

    And concerning because Biden only won by 80k votes and it’s literally his home state.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The gap in early voting was never going to be as wide as 2020. Trump was actively telling his cult to NOT vote early. Now they’re telling them to do just that.

      At the end of the day, the take-home message of this article is that Democrats are over-performing with seniors relative to 2020.

      Trump is running 5 percentage points behind Harris among voters ages 65 and over, slipping back from the previous month, when he and Harris were tied with that demographic. It’s a major shift from 2020, when Trump carried 53 percent of the senior vote in Pennsylvania in a losing effort in the state.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Women live longer than men. The geriatric population will naturally be majority female.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    HAHA LIBTARDS GOOD LUCK UR TIME IS OVER. TRUMP 2024 2028 2032. MAGA!!! DEAL WITH IT SNOWFLAKES

    Edit: sorry, I suffer from chronic stupidity

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I’m gonna need an official JordanLund breakdown on how this affects everything.

    (Not being sarcastic at all. I’m nervous about this shit.)