Well, this just got darker.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are better ways to assess the legitimacy of a media outlet than critiquing its web design. The Wikipedia page might be a good start.

    I don’t like the loginwall, but it doesn’t require payment.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I also think the issue was with your comment. It could’ve been written a bit more clearly

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t know how my comment is unclear. Unless 404 is an AI site somehow, which I wouldn’t even know about.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Paywall. That site frankly does not even look legit and looking at the plethora of other AI sites I don’t know who would use this one. It’s not even displaying correctly and has like 0 information on anything. If I were to stumble upon that site I’d think it is shady as hell.

            The “Paywall” followed by “That site” makes most people think (me included) that you’re talking about the news outlet, 404media, not the AI site mentioned. Writing something like this:

            Paywall. The AI site they mention does not even look legit (…)

            Wouldn’t leave such a wide margin for misinterpretation

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              No. “Paywall” followed by a period, also known as “full stop”, followed by a line break / new paragraph (which you conveniently removed), which all indicate a separation, followed by comparing the AI site to “other AI sites”. You have to be willfully obtuse to assume that when I talk about AI sites I’m referring to the news site there.