Every day at work, Bao Minh spends only two hours creating posts for his company’s social media with ChatGPT and the remaining six hours on watching movies.
Meh. At least online there is a doomer mentality which turns into anger when you point out that a homes and a decent life are actually obtainable, followed by countless bootlicker comments.
65% trailing the EU by 4%. Your metric is absurd 🤣 comparing a school test to home ownership historically. What an insane argument. Tell me you’ve never taken a statistics class with out saying the word 🤣.
I said your metric was worthless. Comparing housing rates with an arbitrary testing scale is at best a lack of understanding math. I also never defended the status quo, only that the doomer mentality is not needed or warranted.
Meh. At least online there is a doomer mentality which turns into anger when you point out that a homes and a decent life are actually obtainable, followed by countless bootlicker comments.
Attainable by 100% of people?
Most
‘Most’ isn’t good enough
51% is ‘most’
If you scored 51% on a test, you would fail
65% trailing the EU by 4%. Your metric is absurd 🤣 comparing a school test to home ownership historically. What an insane argument. Tell me you’ve never taken a statistics class with out saying the word 🤣.
If you think 35% of people not being able to afford a home in a world of plenty is ok, then I think you have more to learn about than statistics
Point out where I said it is okay?
Maybe you shouldn’t be looking for an argument. 65% is the status quo. And it’s not like most of the renters are living homeless. Hence the doomerism.
You laughed in my face and called my viewpoint absurd while defending the status quo
If you think the status quo is acceptable then I’m not going to be the person to convince you otherwise
I said your metric was worthless. Comparing housing rates with an arbitrary testing scale is at best a lack of understanding math. I also never defended the status quo, only that the doomer mentality is not needed or warranted.