Trump Fans Forced to Pee in Bottles While in Line for NYC Rally
www.thedailybeast.com
“Why didn’t they put any porta potties out here for us?” one rally goer asked, comparing New York City to a “third-world country.”

…

Some particularly passionate fans had camped out in Manhattan overnight—in some cases, for multiple nights—in advance of the Sunday event, but were caught short after realizing there were no toilets available.

“We’re peeing in bags and little cups, and we had to put up a little portable privacy shower so people didn’t have to look at each other when they did that,” one such camper told the New York Post, having arrived for the rally on Friday morning.

…

While many turned to makeshift bathroom set-ups, others decided to simply avoid liquids so as not to fall victim to the call of nature.

The Post also spoke to one single parent who’d arrived at Madison Square Garden early Sunday morning with her 7-year-old daughter—who she described as a keen Trump fan.

“You just can’t drink any fluids. We got here a little after 6 a.m… so we’re going to tough it out and not drink or eat anything. It’s kind of insane that there’s no provision at all for people who are going to be waiting this long,” the woman said.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    210·
    24 days ago
    The Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Daily Beast:

    Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.

    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America

    New York Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for New York Post:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including examples of outright fabrication. Editors consider the New York Post more reliable before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department. A 2024 RfC concluded that the New York Post is marginally reliable for entertainment coverage; see below. This consensus does not apply to the broadsheet publication of the same name, that existed from 1801–1942.
    Wiki: mixed - There is consensus that the New York Post (nypost.com  ) and its sub-publications Decider (decider.com  ) and Page Six are considered to be marginally reliable sources for entertainment coverage, including reviews, but should not be used for controversial statements related to living persons.

    MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://nypost.com/2024/10/27/us-news/trump-nyc-rally-crowd-pissed-about-lack-of-toilets/
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-fans-forced-to-pee-in-bottles-while-in-line-for-nyc-rally/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support