• Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Paid product? I’m not sad, we already have Heroic Games Launcher for free, and it works just fine.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It said it was free to download and use but a convenience charge for getting it on Steam.

      But like you, I’m also happy with Heroic, and there’s also Lutris.

      • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are a few foss programs and games that do that and it does make sense since it costs money to put things on steam.

    • Moog Muskie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I didn’t agree with it being a paid product either. And I might have been misunderstanding so don’t take my word on this, but I think it was originally open source and free (at least in money, not sure about freedom) for those running Bazzite and primarily designed for Bazzite Linux and that they planned to keep supporting that version, so I feel like all that would do for the Steam Deck is incentivize people to install Bazzite Linux on it so that it would be free.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s available as a open source Decky plugin, but the steam version was going to be a paid closed source rewrite.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve installed it on a Chimera machine also via Decky so I don’t think it’s distro specific.

        • Moog Muskie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh yeah, I didn’t mean to make it sound like it was distro-speciffic, I just think that Bazzite was the primary platform target originally (but I might be wrong)

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    a launcher that has a primary purpose of launching other games from other stores might have been a bridge too far.

    Really? Because steam has been selling games from companies who do this for years with the only backlash coming from upset customers that the corporations usually ignore anyways.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s still for games sold through Steam. Most importantly, that’s for games that the companies agreed to sell through Steam.

      If I was Valve, my biggest concern here would be that officially selling a tool for sideloading Epic games could be seen as approving of breaking Epic’s ToS. Epic is also very sue happy when it comes to attacking rival companies.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What are you referring to? Because in this case Steam would be getting a certain amount once for you to be able to play hundreds or thousands of games on another platform

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The many games you buy on Steam that then launch another god damn launcher from another company when you launch them.

        I hate it, but Steam never seemed to mind.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    watch the reason be epic and/or gog not wanting their stores to be thought of as ‘junk’