• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is there a red line for you in the sand, or would you vote for Hitler if 101% Hitler was running? When do you abandon hope in the Democrats, if being genocidal Imperialists doing nothing to help marginalized groups, and are running to the right of Trump in 2016 with respect to immigration, doesn’t?

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a non-sequitur, because that’s not what’s happening by any means. But thanks for ceding the point that you’re okay feeling morally superior by doing something that’ll get more people killed.

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes yes, we all see the rhetorical trap you’re trying to deploy. It’s not exactly subtle.

          Meanwhile in the real world, in most of the US there is no realistic alternative to the red/blue dichotomy, and so while we’re actually building that alternative we have to choose between those two. At the national level and in most (possibly all) senate/house races, that’s the reality of the situation. You either work with the coalition you think is less evil and try to convince them to be even less evil, or you admit that you’re okay with the more evil option if it gives you a feeling of moral superiority.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Meanwhile in the real world, in most of the US there is no realistic alternative to the red/blue dichotomy, and so while we’re actually building that alternative we have to choose between those two.

            You aren’t building the alternative, you’re arguing against building the alternative. You support the status quo.

            You either work with the coalition you think is less evil and try to convince them to be even less evil, or you admit that you’re okay with the more evil option if it gives you a feeling of moral superiority

            Correct, you’re doing the latter while I’m doing the former. Trying to work with Socialists and build a good party is better than sitting on your hands and giving the genocidal imperialists the keys forever.

            • lengau@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              “Building an alternative” doesn’t happen in the ballot box. It happens everywhere else.

              It happens by getting a better voting system rather than FPTP, for which I’m doing actual, active advocacy. (Are you?)

              It happens by working at a grassroots level to get people with better opinions elected, all the way down to local judges, city council members and library boards, where I, once again, am active. (Are you?)

              It happens by getting involved in politics at a local level and building a movement. I’m doing that. (Are you?) It doesn’t happen by throwing a tantrum in the voting booth.

              The fascists know this. The fascists use this to their advantage. And the fascists would absolutely love for there to be 10 competing leftist parties acting as a spoiler effect for liberals. Because as bad as liberals are, fascists are worse.

              Throwing out a “no u” when I point out how the things you are doing are paving the way for fascists is not a good argument unless your goal is to actually get fascists into power. And I will choose liberalism over fascism, because that’s the harm reduction path to leftism, whereas letting the fascists win is the harm maximisation path.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                getting a better voting system rather than FPTP

                i just want to pass by to point out that not-fptp is implemented on many places without the big results the proponents of this solution say it to be.

                the same goes for mandatory voting. we have the same issues with electoralism.

        • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There’s no red line that Americans can VOTE on. We don’t get to vote on how America goes to war, period. You really want to frame this in the context that your actually doing something other than undermining a fair election. You’ve gone way past the red line in your support of Trump.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sure there is, you can vote Green or PSL. If you disapprove of the Democrats but will never not vote for them, you’re the same as the rabid supporters of Zionism that vote for the Dems, materially. Are you looking to join a Leftist party, try to destabilize the system and establish Socialism? If not, it seems like you’re just supporting the status quo and not lifting a finger no matter how bad it gets.

            No, I don’t support Trump, that’s why I support leftist candidates and advocate for people to abandon the Dems and Reps.

            • lengau@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              you can vote Green or PSL

              You sure can if you believe that making an insignificant point in a ballot box is worth more than the actual lives of people who would die because of a Trump administration but not under a Harris one. But if you want to make an actual difference. the ballot box is one of the very few times you need to hold your nose and do the uncomfortable thing of choosing liberalism over fascism.

              But if you’re okay with fascism, sure. Go and make your vote a spoiler that helps the fascists win. I’m sure the people who die because doctors who were scared to provide medically necessary abortions will be grateful that you did the morally superior, but entirely ineffective, thing.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You sure can if you believe that making an insignificant point in a ballot box is worth more than the actual lives of people who would die because of a Trump administration but not under a Harris one. But if you want to make an actual difference. the ballot box is one of the very few times you need to hold your nose and do the uncomfortable thing of choosing liberalism over fascism.

                You can vote for fascism if that’s what you want, I reject it.

                But if you’re okay with fascism, sure. Go and make your vote a spoiler that helps the fascists win. I’m sure the people who die because doctors who were scared to provide medically necessary abortions will be grateful that you did the morally superior, but entirely ineffective, thing.

                You’re voting fascism in, the Dems have failed for half a century to codify abortion rights because they don’t care.

                • lengau@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You can vote for fascism if that’s what you want, I reject it.

                  You’re literally making the choice to put fascism in power. I’m trying to stop you from making the same mistake I made in 2016.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            then is the system fair? is it really democracy whats happening here?

            societies generally throw away the rules and stop relying on these institutions when it becomes clear they arent actually doing anything for us. why arent us?