10-year-old Fatima Jaafar Abdullah was killed in pager explosions in Lebanon.

Israel murders another kid again.

  • ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I get going after your ‘enemy,’ but this is even worse than firing randomly into a crowd of Palestinians. They pushed a button not knowing who would die. This is low, even for them.

    I can’t even think of a devil’s advocate argument for this.

    • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I believe the devil’s advocate argument would be that, based on Hezbollah’s internal communications, the Mossad intercepted a shipment of pagers which were being purchased to replace their (potentially compromised) mobile phones, knowing that these were - in theory - being distributed exclusively to Hezbollah operatives. That would make it the most precise military strike of all time.

      Everyone who launches a rocket is accepting the possibility of “collateral damage”, but this is surely the most surgical of surgical strikes in history. And yet, yes, they must have accepted the risk of bystander casualties, which just serves to highlight how awful that logic is. It’s definitely not worse than randomly firing into a crowd, though.

      • xenomor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s literally a war crime to attack people who are not actively participating in combat. That includes people who are members of your enemy’s military.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That would make every crime a war crime going back thousands of years where they would lay siege on villages until the citizens starved

            • BussyCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That means the term “war crimes” is meaningless because it would just mean war. The point of specifying some actions as war crimes is to denote things that even in war you shouldn’t do not just say that all wars are crimes