• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    our main issue today is with 24/7 cable news and social media, neither of which were ever governed by the fairness doctrine.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s kind of like say because Reagan cut taxes on the rich back in the 1980s we can’t change those laws.

      We’re never going back to the Cronkite Era but the FCC still does regulate cable TV.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The tax code is not codified in the constitution - free speech and free press is. the only reason the fairness doctrine was ever constitutional was because the public airwaves were a limited resource. That limitation does not exist on cable TV or the internet, so you’re going to have a huge uphill battle through the courts to make a Neo-fairness-doctrine for cable or social media constitutional.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Further, social media crosses international borders, so it’s a lot more difficult to wrangle and regulate as opposed to networks firmly operating only inside the bounds of the continental US.