• bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Just pulled the trigger, only had European plugs in stock. I’ve got adapters so np. I’m getting it to replace my Raspberry Pi router that I’ve been using for a few years.

    *Edit, I should say I’m a huge fan openWRT despite the fact that 15 years ago I managed to brick my linksys router so bad it actually caused sparks to shoot out the ethernet jacks. I flashed the wrong model firmware.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      GL.inet has some LTE routers with OpenWRT on them. I haven’t tried the LTE version, and the one (Shadow) I have has to be rebooted once a week, but that’s a really cheap one I was trying.

    • v01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I just ordered the GL-MT6000. Wondering if I should cancel and get this instead.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m glad it’s open hardware as much as open software, but I think I’ll wait to see what the OpenWrt Two looks like.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m fine with the looks and hardware, except I’m not upgrading again for a wifi 6 router. I’ll wait till they make a 7. 7 has a couple pretty big improvements over 6.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I was thinking the same thing, because I want either Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7, as I currently have Wi-Fi 5, and it works well enough.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    The fact that this has USB type C as a option for powering it makes me very interested, but the fact that it does not have at least Wi-Fi 6E makes me not interested. So I think I will have to wait for version 2 of this.

    • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      In the us at least, you cannot have 6ghz operation and connectorized antennae like this unit has

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Okay, I didn’t look closely enough at the device to notice that it had connector and 10 is instead of fixed antennas.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Oh come on, don’t knock the router for not being the best access point. That’s not what it’s for.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        If I remember correctly, Wi-Fi 6E was finalized in like 2021 or 2022, and it’s 2024 and very close to 2025. So it should be about three years that Wi-Fi 6E has been in the wild. I only have 500 MBPS fiber anyway so I wouldn’t saturate the links but I do want the six gigahertz Wi-Fi band because if I’m going to buy a new router I’m going to probably keep it for like 10 years. I think I purchased my previous router in like 2019 and I’m still using it. My router is an appliance that I only replace when the damn thing breaks pretty much.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m saying that your router and access point should be separate devices anyway, especially if you don’t want to replace said router.

          My router doesn’t have wireless at all. I have a dedicated WiFi 6 access point for that, if I want to go up to a newer standard I just replace the AP.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, fair enough. I’m kind of an intermediate user, because when I think of Access Point and Router, I think of the same device. But yet, I’m definitely a big advocate of open source software and hardware. But I do not self-host very much.

            • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Less about open source, more of just a practical stance. The thing about networking is that standards change all the time, and it’s better to have a single device serve a single role on the network than to cram all those functions into a combo box.

              So an ideal network has a separate router, switch, and access point. Ideally two of each in redundant configurations but that’s not required for most people.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Isn’t RAM like the biggest bottleneck in routers causing bufferblaot and packet loss?

    How does the article not mention how much RAM this device has?

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Packet loss occurs when a router has to drop some packets because the buffer to store them is running out because the link where they are supposed to go is overloaded.

      Bufferbloat is the issue where you make your queues too deep, i.e. you allocate too much RAM to buffering, while the cause of the buffering still exists, so the deeper queue just fills up anyway, so you haven’t improved anything, and have induced extra latency on the packets that do make it trough.

      Deep buffers can help in situations where you have a step down in link speed, but only bursty and not sustained overloading of the slower output link.

      The big bottleneck in router hardware is more about TCAM or HBM memory used to store the FIB of the global routing table. Since the table has grown so much the devices with less high speed memory can’t hold the table anymore, and if they start swapping the FIB to normal memory your routing performance goes to shit.

      So not all of your concerns seem to apply to this class of device, but of course you’re right, The Register should have mentioned the RAM.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Thanks. You know a lot about hardware spec reqs in networking equipment. It always drives me crazy when buying a router because they dont seem to list this info.

        Do you have any general advice for spec’ing hardware reqs for small businesses with event spaces with occasionally loads of people? How do u ensure the router can handle everyone’s traffic without dropping packets?

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Wait, is this why packet shapers limiting bandwidth on one guest vlan drop so many damn packets? How do you prevent this?

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      …is it?

      …can I get a peer review on the amount of shade we’re being given, here? I get it’s their hardware but isn’t it more… chosen hardware? Isn’t the software also public?

      Where’s the shade, exactly?