Summary

Elon Musk has filed a court injunction to block OpenAI’s transition to a fully for-profit business and prevent it from allegedly restricting investors from supporting competitors like his AI startup, xAI.

Musk accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of antitrust violations, claiming they used “group boycotts” to limit funding for rivals while benefitting from shared sensitive information.

OpenAI dismissed the allegations as baseless. The legal battle reflects escalating competition in the booming generative AI industry, valued at $157 billion, with Musk’s xAI emerging as a new challenger.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re not wrong, but the genie is out of the bottle. VC thinks it’s profitable and it can be done on a home computer so it’s here to stay.

      Buckle up buckaroo.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        AI is kinda like nuclear weapons, except without requiring a specific rare element in enriched form to wield.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        3 days ago

        This particular genie can be put back in the bottle because there are copyright violations.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol, no it can’t. Do you have any idea how many smaller LLMs are out there? Small enough to be trained and fine-tuned on consumer hardware. And most of those are “open” sourced models. Which means tens of thousands already have them on their computers and running locally. This genie will never go back in the bottle.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          A far stronger argument IMO is that they’re pretty useless.

          Like if there was an open source clippy I could run on my desktop, would I? No, no I would not.

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s a difference between corporations profiting off copyrighted data and individuals not profiting…

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, but the comment you replied to literally says “and it can be done on a home computer” and you argue against that with copyright laws

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                That was for the VCs. VCs don’t care about the LLM on your computer. They care about openAI et al