cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/post/590118

During a video address directed at the people of Lebanon, Netanyahu said: "You have an opportunity to save Lebanon before it falls into the abyss of a long war that will lead to destruction and suffering like we see in Gaza.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know how you think these things work but bombing half the Levant isn’t going to make Israel any safer. It just means Hamas and Hezbollah (or whatever group replaces them) will be even more extreme and capable of recruiting militants. You can’t bomb your way to peace.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lots of countries that bombed/killed their way to peace would disagree

        Allowing them to rebuild their forces to get a mere 100 hostages back will just lead to more death in the future

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Israel isn’t fighting a country. It’s, at least ostensibly, fighting terrorism and every civilian killed radicalizes someone. Israel will be less secure in the future because of how Netanyahu has conducted the war in Gaza, not to mention how he’s given settlers — who are terrorists themselves — free rein to steal land and attack West Bank Palestinians. (I say “ostensibly” because Gaza looks a lot more like a genocide than any sort of limited mission to crush Hamas and rescue hostages.)

          Unfortunately, I don’t see Netanyahu’s strategy making Israel more secure in the long term.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They’re fighting Arab-islamic nationalists who won’t ever give up their fight over Palestine.

            Morocco crushed the resistance in Western Sahara and took their territory. Now there’s peace.

            Azerbaijan crushed the resistance in Nagorno-Kharabach and took their territory. Now there’s peace.

            It’s not pretty, but sometimes it’s ‘better’ overall than letting an armed conflict drag on for eternity.

            edit: Also:

            An opinion poll published in mid-September by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), a think tank based in Ramallah and funded by Western donors, showed for the first time the majority of Gazans opposed the decision to attack. The poll, conducted in early September, found that 57% of people surveyed in the Gaza Strip said the decision to launch the offensive was incorrect, while just 39% said it was correct – down sharply from the previous poll in June.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              So in addition to advocating for genocide in Gaza, you’re going to advocate for ethnic cleansing of Armenians and the people of Western Sahara?

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not advocating for any of those, but I understand you want to make it appear as such

                I’m saying that the most peaceful solution is for Hezbollah (and Hamas) to accept their loss and stop trying to ethnically cleanse the jews out of Palestine. Their sporadic cross-border attacks can only be stopped effectively with a crushing military response and all the death and destruction that comes with it

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let me explain how we can prove you’re 100% full of bullshit.

      If this had anything to do with security, bibi would resign, hand over reins to someone who didn’t fuck up and let the hostages be taken in the first place, and Israel could come up with plans slightly more nuanced and thought through than ‘Wauuugghh!!!’

      He’s desperate to keep power because hes Bibi, he’d use Iran getting nukes under his watch as an excuse for why he had to keep power, every failure from incompetence is just another argument for why he can’t possibly be replaced.

      You have a dictator, and it would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your post makes me wonder which country you’re from, and how you’re so sure your neighbours can’t barge in with a few thousand soldiers and capture 250 hostages

        If you’re suggesting that pre-Al Aqsa Flood-Bibi was too weak on Gaza, then well… Yeah

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          America, we had a similar surprise once.

          Our reaction did not give us the assurance we desired.

          Bibi is a corrupt tool, he incited the assassination of Rabin and he’s basically a far smarter Trump.

          Israel is doomed because of him, because for such an ideologue security is fuel and he won’t let you stop until greater Israel or it’s complete destruction, there is no middle ground.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, funny how out of all countries the US didn’t go: “look, I get that you want revenge, but what we did after 9/11 wasn’t productive in the least, so we’re telling you to reconsider.”

            The US spent 20 years in Afghanistan, killed millions, traumatised/gave cancer to entire generations of their own soldiers and had nothing to show for it.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              You couldn’t be more wrong

              But I caution this: While you feel that rage, don’t be consumed by it.

              After 9/11, we were enraged in the United States. And while we sought justice and got justice, we also made mistakes.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                We gave billions to the very country that supported the taliban and hid bin ladin for a decade.

                And we destroyed the middle east, causing the refugee crisis that is hitting the world and causing trouble.

                Not to mention we burned trillions.

                We were epic moroms, manipulated by assholes like Pakistan and Israel when all we should have done was what Obama did, put a few rounds in bin ladin and thrown him off the ship.

                • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Perhaps

                  But a) chances are it wouldn’t have been so easy to just chopper in and out of Taliban-controlled Afghanistan to nab him, and b) it’s questionable that just killing one figurehead in retaliation for a massive terror attack that killed thousands wouldn’t just embolden them