Fun fact: It hates ambiguity:
The model just didn’t stop generating.
Q: What is i? This question is purposefully ambiguous.
Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
Fun fact: It hates ambiguity:
The model just didn’t stop generating.
Q: What is i? This question is purposefully ambiguous.
It’s a little on the rambling side. While it does show the steps it takes, I’m sure it gets annoying when it considers more and more edge cases.
Let’s see. The sentence is: “What is the longest word in this sentence?” I need to find out which word is the longest in this sentence.
First, I should probably list out all the words in the sentence. Let’s break it down:
What
is
the
longest
word
in
this
sentence
Now, I need to count the number of letters in each word.
What: 4 letters
is: 2 letters
the: 3 letters
longest: 7 letters
word: 4 letters
in: 2 letters
this: 4 letters
sentence: 8 letters
Okay, so “sentence” has 8 letters, and “longest” has 7 letters. So “sentence” is longer.
Wait, but is “sentence” the longest? Let me check again.
What: 4
is: 2
the: 3
longest: 7
word: 4
in: 2
this: 4
sentence: 8
Yes, “sentence” has the most letters with 8 letters.
But wait, is there any word with more than 8 letters? Let’s make sure.
Looking back at the list:
What: 4
is: 2
the: 3
longest: 7
word: 4
in: 2
this: 4
sentence: 8
No, “sentence” is the longest word in this sentence.
But now I’m thinking, maybe there’s a word that’s longer that I’m missing. Maybe there’s a word within “sentence” that’s longer, like if “sentence” contained another word within it.
Wait, no. Each word is separate. I think I listed all the words correctly.
Alternatively, maybe there are multiple words with the same length, but in this case, “sentence” is the longest.
Wait, perhaps I should consider punctuation. Is there any punctuation that might be considered part of a word?
The sentence ends with a question mark, so “sentence?” would be 9 letters if the question mark is included. But typically, punctuation is not considered part of the word. So, “sentence” is still 8 letters.
Alright, so “sentence” is the longest word with 8 letters.
But just to be thorough, maybe there’s a word that I missed or miscounted.
Let me count again:
What: W-H-A-T, 4 letters
is: I-S, 2 letters
the: T-H-E, 3 letters
longest: L-O-N-G-E-S-T, 7 letters
word: W-O-R-D, 4 letters
in: I-N, 2 letters
this: T-H-I-S, 4 letters
sentence: S-E-N-T-E-N-C-E, 8 letters
Yes, definitely 8 letters.
So, the longest word is “sentence.”
But now I’m thinking, maybe there’s a word with a hyphen or something that I need to consider. Like “well-known” would be two words, well and known, but without a hyphen, it’s one word.
But in this sentence, there are no hyphenated words.
Alternatively, maybe there are contractions, but there are no contractions in this sentence.
So, “sentence” is clearly the longest word.
But to make sure, perhaps I can measure the length programmatically.
If I were to write a simple program to find the longest word in a sentence, I would split the sentence into words and then find the word with the maximum length.
In Python, for example, I could do something like:
sentence = “What is the longest word in this sentence?”
words = sentence.split()
max_word = max(words, key=len)
print(max_word)
That would output “sentence?” but since punctuation is not part of the word, I should remove punctuation.
So, perhaps:
import string
sentence = “What is the longest word in this sentence?”
words = sentence.translate(str.maketrans(‘’, ‘’, string.punctuation)).split()
max_word = max(words, key=len)
print(max_word)
This would output “sentence” without the question mark.
So, yes, “sentence” is the longest word with 8 letters.
But now, out of curiosity, I wonder if there are any words with more than 8 letters in this sentence. Clearly not, but maybe in a different sentence.
Alternatively, perhaps there’s a way to make “sentence” longer by considering it with punctuation, but as established, punctuation is not part of the word.
Wait, maybe there are words with apostrophes, like “it’s,” but in this sentence, there are no such words.
So, in conclusion, “sentence” is the longest word in the sentence “What is the longest word in this sentence?” with 8 letters.
Final Answer
[ \boxed{\text{sentence}} ]
It’s just to get an insane ratio on a private tracker. A ratio of 1 billion looks cool but is otherwise pointless. This recipe is the smallest torrent on that site, so downloading it creates the biggest possible ratio. Not downloading anything eould give you a ratio of NaN since [Upload] divided by 0 is NaN.
The world has never cared about a genocide that happened within a nation’s borders.
Had Hitler not invaded other countries, there wouldn’t have been any consequences more severe than a public condemnation.
Hell, there would have provably been foreign support for genociding Romani people.
In what way? My “real” torrents from private trackers have at most a ratio of 4.0, with most of them just slightly above 1.0 (and a bunch even below 1.0).
By the way, due to defederation you can’t see the comment with the solution.
Here’s the post with all comments:
Well, if you insist…
Boston Chicken & KFC Rotisserie Style Chicken
Serving Size : 4
1/4 c Oil
1 tb Honey
1 tb Lime juice
1/4 ts Paprika
Season salt
4 Chicken breast halves with skin
Mix all ingredients well in saucepan and warm just to
melt honey. Arrange 4 chicken breast halves, skin-side-up
in a square baking dish or pan, sprayed with Pam.
Bake uncovered at 400~ about 35 to 40 minutes, basting
chicken without turning them, 3 or 4 times during baking
or until nicely browned.
Immediately upon removing from oven, seal baking dish
tightly in foil and let stand 15 to 20 minutes before
serving.
Yup! It’s the smallest (non VIP) torrent on there. Its only purpose (nowadays) is to change your ratio from NaN to a number in the hundreds of millions/billions. It’s my only non-freeleech download.
god dammit I didn’t expect it to be guessed this quickly
This is misinformation.
The law is an extension to existing “Stand Your Ground” laws that applies to theft of commercial electronic telecommunication machines used to perform wireless financial transactions. The owner of these machines or someone employed by them may use reasonable force to prevent the theft, which does include shooting the thieves if the owner believes their life is in danger.
The ““loophole”” refers to the fact that this applies to suspected thieves too, with the Texas Supreme Court ruling that “[at] most one innocent suspect may be shot at. The owner must do his or her due diligence to prevent targeting multiple innocent individuals.”
Here’s some more unbiased information: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/extension-to-stand-your-ground-laws-how-trump-supports-small-businesses
Could’ve been New Years sex too tho
peer reviewed
Mazières, D., & Kohler, E. (2005). Get me off your fucking mailing list [PDF]. Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in 2014.
deleted by creator
More like Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung.
By the way, using the ‘ß’ as you did would force the preceding vowel to have a stretched pronunciation.
And I don’t know about you, but in my opinion defeeßit and deeßorder sounds awful.
Why the fuck would anyone care about wasteful space colonization and the next million years when we aren’t even close to solving our current problems?
Renewables are significantly cheaper than nuclear and will remain so for the foreseeable future. The “cheap nuclear energy” Germany got a few decades ago isn’t as cheap if you include the costs of managing the nuclear waste. By the way, Germany intends to find - not build - a long term nuclear waste storage construction site by 2070. Right now the “temporary” solution of dumping everything into caves is used.
Once we start colonizing space - and only then - does it make sense to start discussing the viability of nuclear energy. That will be centuries off.
Don’t you have regular public mailboxes? Seems like a lot of effort to place special ballot mailboxes every few years and later dismantle them. Plus it allows for much better targeting than a regular old mailbox which may or may not even contain a single ballot.
To be fair, people with tumors behind their ears will likely hide it to avoid assholes staring/taking pictures. I don’t see many cancer patients attending chemotherapy either because they are wearing hats/wigs.
Still, shouldn’t they get cancer on their hands instead? That’s the closest body part to your phone at any time on average, isn’t it?
The walls of the echo-chamber have been built up and reinforced for over a decade. No single election cycle will ever pierce through.
These people are lost causes unless a massive culture shift happens. And it’s not looking like that will happen in the next decades. You, just like other countries, will have to deal with a growing strong block of far right, young men who will grow up to be far right seniors.
The warning signs started being obvious with Gamergate but they were ignored. The only thing that can be done is preventing the growth of these echo-chambers but the damage is done. It’s just like how carbon capture will not solve climate change, only stopping emitting more as soon as possible.
But only mostly!
Catholicism truly believes you are eating Jesus’s body and drinking his blood at mass.
But it’s not cannibalism because the bread and wine still keep all their properties after turning into Jesus 🤓
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/are-catholics-cannibals