Wait, is it real?
Wait, is it real?
“At Planet Fitness, we have robust operational brand protocols in place, as the safety and well-being of our members is our top priority. We are working closely with our local franchisee to ensure they are upholding those brand protocols,” Gosselin added."
Ah yes, the problem here is “operational brand protocol”.
I read uterus removal, not tube tying. Maybe a pedantic difference, but is he explicitly trying to highlight the threat value for the statement?
I wrote a haiku on another similar article and I’m proud of it. I don’t have a title yet. I’m not usually poetic. Here goes:
This is how they’re spending it:
Dang, well surely it does that on the first trip and not after I’ve already spent so much time carefully shuffling everybody across? Right? Right?
I take the cat across. Then return. Then I take the vaccum across. I return with the cat. I take the lettuce across. Then return. Pick up the cat, and cross a final time.
But also CARdio – “but he drove a CAR”
On a lighter note, just discovered this series of animated videos of real trump recordings. https://youtu.be/Ug51ybcGhiw?feature=shared
Cats are liquid, but sometimes gas. Lighter than air.
It’s an interesting problem. How do you maintain the privacy of anonymous votes while ensuring the integrity of the larger process and all without making it too hard to vote that people don’t have access?
Is that where they dump the ads they block?
Is that how they sniff out the ads to block?
Privacy badger doesn’t require somebody to add an address to a list to block it, it figures our statistically when something should be blocked. The upside is that it can block things that are new and haven’t been added to a list. I assume it could also better adapt to new methods to get stuff through a typical blocker.
I wish it were easy to do. Mail in voting is a game changer. Check out how difficult it is in Alabama, for example: https://www.sos.alabama.gov/alabama-votes/voter/absentee-voting