have there been any court cases that hinged on these laws?
have there been any court cases that hinged on these laws?
Interesting, but I wonder what they break it down to. Is it completely broken down or do they shit nanoplastics?
Though the ruling did not state the level at which fluoridation would damage brains
This right here. The levels have to be many times that in drinking water for it to have any harmful effects.
They have stopped doing that in Norway, at least here. Not sure if it was a corona effect or if they thought it wasnt worth it in terms of customers either shopping somewhere else or shopping less because they take a small shopping basket instead.
I’m sure he did lots of things, Perry, the guy’s a drink mongul!
Economics is a tool, and yes of course you can get different conclusions based on different assumptions. Doesn’t mean economics is bad, just means it is being used in different ways and for different purposes. Same with statistics. assumpsions are important.
Make smallpox great again!