doc

Community rule is 30 days.

If all candidates are on the same timeline then I agree. That’s not the case here. 100 days vs literal years of planning.

I buy all my supplies from companies making more than 25m, who buy from other companies making more than 25m, and so on. My COGS will go up a minimum of 3%, more than likely closer to 10% when you compound the entire supply chain. I don’t care that I won’t pay into the general tax fund, but I sure as hell care that I’ll have to convince my retail customers to pay 10% more on my products after already struggling with inflation cost increases the last few years.

Two letter TLDs are reserved for countries. No gTLDs use a two letter TLD.

According to the rules set by the org that controls the fate of IO. They can easily change the rules if they wanted. There is a vested interest in not losing IO, and nothing but their own rule to stop them. Who’s to tell them they can’t do whatever they want in this matter?

Yep. This is such a weird fear monger topic.

If the country that owns IO ceases to exist then IANA will just make it an ICANN generic TLD. Such a widely used TLD won’t be allowed to disappear. The rules are all made up anyway.

ActiveSync is to Exchange as IMAP/POP3 is to other email providers.

So if you want your email client to speak with an Exchange server you’re using ActiveSync, not other protocols used by other types of servers.

Exchange ActiveSync is a licensed protocol. If any FOSS app handles it for free I’d love to know.

The Washington district that includes Vancouver has one of the most contested House races in the country this year.

They explain nothing. They’re in the same boat as all others: open source will let them keep MV2 longer than mainstream chrome, but that future is uncertain as the main project codebase starts to evolve around MV3 and backward compatibility to hack MV2 back in gets lost over time. Nobody here can make promises, and sites that make that make those judgments are naive.

If we’re being cynical, he knows he stands to benefit. ;)

Not really sure what the calculus is here.

Don’t get on his bad side? Not that they aren’t already at odds, just remember T is highly transactional and this could be seen as a favor that may buy some brownie points.

Arts and letters daily is great. Overlaps a bit with your interests, though not every day.

Aldaily.com

Good. Don’t let Congress inaction in the pursuit of election politics work, and take credit for yourselves instead.

This is broken governance in action, but at least we have action this time. Pray the courts stay out of it for the sake of the people being helped by this move.

Brilliant being combative with strangers in the same echo chamber as you. Glad we spent this time together.

I’ve been hearing it for over 8 years now, to varrying degrees of intensity across the media spectrum. I’d assume anyone else paying even the least amount of attention has, too.

Yet here we are at a 48% split with 3 weeks to go.

So yeah, keep reporting. Maybe that fraction of a percent will make the difference; it’s close enough that it could! But don’t hold your breath, and don’t keep beating on the same horse as if doing so will make a difference.

I think we’re at a boy who cries wolf point. News pieces like this are almost a daily occurrence. Those who don’t care won’t simply because it happens again. If anything it will further galvanize their resistance.

There’s a sense that these things must be reported and recorded for reasons of history, but for whatever effect one would like to happen as a result it is probably useless.

So, in other words, SCOTUS took the case to invent something entirely unrelated in order to rollback 40 years of progress. Got it. I’ll look forward in dread for the outcome in 9 months.