That kind of sucks, but it should only be for a dev release
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp-data/-/blob/main/images/splash-log.md
That kind of sucks, but it should only be for a dev release
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp-data/-/blob/main/images/splash-log.md
Thanks for bringing that up, I played the shit out of Blinx 2 back when and had all but forgotten it.
Incidentally my first thought reading your comment was “Prince of Persia: Sands of Time”
What do the exclamation points mean?
Two of the “questions” are just statements
Unpaid Open Source developers will have trouble fulfilling increasing government requirements, for example the EU Cyber Security Act.
Emerging companies like Tidelift, which pay developers, will solve the current problems of Open Source.
Open Source Software follows the Open Source Definition, while Free Software follows the Free Software Definition.
They have heavy overlap, one is not a subset of the other, and they are similarly restrictive, just shepherded by different groups. I’m sure there are licences that satisfy one but not the other, but they would have to be few and far between; just reading through each it’s not obvious how one could satisfy only one definition.
If I read that right, the normal way. It’s not a special lock, just the normal lock screen. The use case seems to be addressing the idea of your phone being snatched while unlocked, and then attempted brute forcing into apps with sensitive data pin/biometric locks
What thing called turtle are you referring to?
You would be giving up some feed-rate control and retraction. Probably not too bad with certain materials and large scale prints, but I’d be surprised if you could do anything moderately precise with this.
Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person’s computer.
How about MNT Reform or it’s Pocket little brother?
They get you
They do NOT get you
The “solution” is buy their product.
This article is an ad.