The above statement is correct until this text is replaced with a surprised pikachu meme.

Not really, everyone who uses generative AI is either aware and doesn’t care or doesn’t care to be aware.

I am hoping for a work of art. I am expecting a story about how they had to completely restart development 3 times, ending with a product they only put 3 (at most) years into.

British Wikipedian, Stuart Marshall, made the final ruling in September, decisively supporting the article’s inclusion. “Based on the strength of the arguments … and it’s not close … I discarded the argument that scholars haven’t reached a conclusion on whether the Gaza genocide is really taking place”, Marshall wrote in his decision. “The matter remains contested, but there’s a metric truckload of scholarly sources linked in this discussion that show a clear predominance of academics who say that it is.”

I would hope so.

This election is a test: Can the American public resoundingly reject a man who has not merely been a chaotic extremist but has also attacked the American system of republican government itself?

Stay away from me and my Prego Traditional chug jug.

Time to watch it spread!

The people voting for Trump lack self-awareness, empathy, and critical thinking, but they are still humans.

“Something for everyone.” = “I sure hope everyone buys this shit!”

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/blizzard-promise-something-for-everyone-in-warcrafts-30th-anniversary-direct-next-month

https://www.businessofapps.com/data/linkedin-statistics/

LinkedIn generated $15.7 billion revenue in 2023, an increase of 7.4% year-on-year

Expecting an empty, repetitive open world game. Hoping to be wrong.

Naw, they will only persue after the election. No way would they risk displeasing their potential king. Especially if he is saying he will throw more tax breaks their way.

Pretty smart move actually. If Harris wins, the legal action will continue regardless of who he voted for. If trump wins and he finds out that Rudy voted against him, that would arguably be worse for him.

Basically, Goodrazi got touchy when asked about his organization’s efforts to neutralize government-spearheaded free tax filing programs. He hit back that Patel’s question — the editor said that Intuit is “legendary for lobbying against free direct federal e-filing” and then straightforwardly asked how much of their budget is allocated towards lobbying efforts — was “fundamentally” based in the “wrong premise” and was “inaccurate,” before declaring that Intuit doesn’t “lobby against free.”

Most likely the 3 people in their think tank who know fully well what the end goal of the MAGA movement is.

Don’t worry, according to undecided/centrists, it is all metaphorical and the news is just fear mongering. Trump wouldn’t ACTUALLY do what he said he will.