https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law

Changes to the law are only considered ex post facto laws in the United States when they bring about a criminal punishment - So prosecutors couldn’t charge Trump if the 22nd amendment was changed to only allow 1 term, for example. So if the 22nd amendment was altered to allow for more terms, it would not be considered an Ex post facto law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v._Bull

IANAL, but this is what I was taught in high school

https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc/4th-generation-9004-and-8004-series/amd-epyc-9754.html

Launched June of 2023

128c/256t

$11,900

400w TDP

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/240777/intel-xeon-6980p-processor-504m-cache-2-00-ghz/specifications.html

Launched Q3 of 2024

128c/256t

$17,800

500w TDP

I don’t think Granite Rapids are going to flip it back in Intels favor

Well yeah, driving people to quit to save money on severance from the impending layoffs is the whole point of forcing them to return to the office

Armed minorities are harder to oppress

Because it is a bot that

1. Gives a biased opinion
2. Pretends to be objective
3. Was not asked for, and does not need to exist
4. Forced onto the users despite many objections

One could just block it if they wished, but many users feel that their only way to give real feedback is by downvoting it. The Lemmy World admins have clearly shown they will not remove it no matter how the userbase feels.

If it simply gave the admins/mods feedback about sites, there wouldn’t be very much pushback. But since it’s in every story, giving an opinion of the news organization, it is attempting to influence the conversation.