Voyager for Lemmy, Thunderbird email client, Firefox browser, Librera FD ebook reader, Mercurygram for Telegram, QUIK SMS, Material Files, LibreTube

I played Minecraft blind for about a year as a child and didn’t get much done, to be fair, but I had lots of fun. Optimising stuff and beating the game sometimes takes the fun out of it.

Minecraft

Stardew Valley

The Witcher 3

According to Wikipedia as the chaos makes the day ‘bad’ or ‘black’

I would use it, but it doesn’t support any devices with a decent battery life, such as the Hauwei or Xaoumi watches

Which is a misleading title, clickbait, getting you to click to find out what you already knew.

Only if they already have enough testosterone, if they don’t have enough and increase it to natural levels, it does.

Normal users care about cosmetics though. If it doesn’t look modern, they’ll assume its functionality reflects that too, even if it doesn’t. And let’s be honest, even power users prefer nicer looking software if it doesn’t come at the expense of functionality, that’s why userChrome.css themes are so popular for Firefox. Zen browser looks like it’s making that a more seamless and intuitive process for users.

CD Project Red, the developers of The Witcher.

Oh, I don’t care about what’s legal. At least with GOG there’s no DRM so it can’t physically stop me doing what I want with them.

I do own the games I bought from GOG, not the ones I licenced from Steam.

🤣

What do you think I really mean? Killing anyone, including billionaires, is unethical. Maybe it could be justified in a utilitarian sense if it was guaranteed to lead to wealth redistribution and there was no other way, but even that isn’t the case.

Of course. However killing billionaires is still immoral if there are peaceful solutions to redistributing the wealth, and useless if the act of killing them doesn’t magically redistribute the wealth fairly (it doesn’t)

Obviously redistributing their wealth would be good. Killing them doesn’t automatically give you their wealth to redistribute, and redistributing without killing them is also a possibility you seem to be ignoring.

What? No, why would you assume those things about me. There are no ethical billionaires.

Just to be clear, you don’t need to convince me there are no moral billionaires.

No, but neither ways have succeeded, we still live in capitalist system. I’d prefer to try a method that doesn’t involve unnecessary killing and suffering.

Maybe if we figure out how to trigger false vacuum decay

Just because some of them indirectly kill people doesn’t make it moral to kill them. Maybe if it actually would make the world better, you could have a utilitarian argument for it, but as long as you just kill individual billionaires and not creating a new socialist system they’ll just be replaced by new billionaires. As I said, regardless of whether it’s moral to kill them, it won’t help.