Yes, if a dog attacks you can shoot it. That’s true pretty much everywhere.

Why in the fuck is this considered world news?

Her dissenting opinion is here. It’s quite thorough, and while reasonable people could disagree on each point (myself included), I didn’t find anything overtly biased in her analysis. Paragraphs 22 - 30 are the bulk of her analysis. Chiefly she cited 3 concerns:

• without Hamas as a party, she didn’t see how any order could be complied with without Israel unilaterally withdrawing and being forced to accept subsequent attacks
• most requested orders amounted to “follow IHL”, which Israel is already bound to order or no order
• she believes SA is conflating Hamas and Palestinian civilians in several key arguments