Good enough for me, I’m easy.

Hey, I’m 2 out of 3!

This got me weirdly thinking about what would be the perfect size and whether they could genetically select for that, then I realized I was thinking way too much about a web comic and should just go see if there is a porn version of Gattaca.

I don’t judge.

I’d like to meet the bird that fucked the pig.

It’s likely that HIS credentials were revoked, but anyone in IT will tell you there many systems which are accessed by a shared direct username/password login, and yes while that should be changed when needed a much easier solution would be to lock those apps/sites behind a VPN which is much easier to revoke access to.

It is sometimes good at building SQL code examples, but almost always needs fine-tuning since it doesn’t know the schema specifics.

Having said that one time it gave me code that resulted in an error, then I went back to GPT and said “This code you gave me is giving this error, can you fix it?” and all it would do is say something like “Correct, that code is wrong and will give an error.”

Uh huh, on my screen it’s literally 2 comments below this one, kinda feels like you’re looking for an excuse not to answer. Kinda like that time a wrestling organization looked for a bullshit excuse to disqualify someone, what a lovely parallel.

The thread begins when someone says something. Then people reply. ELSEWHERE in this thread is a reply, from me, quoting Snopes. Go back to when systemglitch commented in this post, follow the path to my reply quoting Snopes.

Ok I’ll repeat myself: elsewhere in this thread I replied quoting the Snopes article on this subject. Are those instructions too confusing for you?

So you ignored the Snopes article, got it. You only seem to reply to the comments that are easy for you to deflect, how interesting.

First of all, and you knew I was gonna lead with this, The Daily Mail?

Ok, let’s pretend that’s a legit news organization, now read my comment quoting Snopes and tell me if that answers any of your “questions”.

You seem to be misunderstanding, intentionally I would guess. They claimed they did a test to “confirm” she was not a woman, I’m saying that’s a steaming hot load of bullshit and they were just looking for an excuse and they have no results to release.

Please cite your sources saying there are news reports that she’s a man.

Why does she have to? Why would she have a copy of a test allegedly done by a 3rd party that, based on news reports, was just using it as an excuse to eliminate her for beating a Russian opponent?

But they haven’t said what test they performed to determine this, which would be the norm so the results can be verified.