• GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Splendid discussion as usual dingdong. Twist then pull up

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          So much assuming.

          My “toxicity” are legitimate concerns to not get trump, who will ramp everything up. Well look who’s here now.

          As I said, single issue stay homes, and “alternative” voices that actually only served to strike at Dems are issues I believe shifted the narrative and may have influenced the election.

          I made a thread to discuss other influences beyond just punching down at 3rd party platforms.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes we heard you the first 3 times. Its the voters fault. The Democrats are merely victims, completely maladroit at managing their own fate.

            You aren’t making different any new points or clarification, just repeating the same, tired tropes that just handed the US democracy over to fascism. And we get it, you are incapable of expanding your understanding beyond the initial assumptions you made. No need to repeat yourself any longer.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Honestly dude I commented with the intent of discussing the issue but you’re just slinging mud.

              It’s not toxicity to make an observation on forces that drove voters to not vote for harris. I didn’t say Harris was a queen and how dare they. I didn’t say the Dems ran a good campaign or a good primary or something.

              It’s not that 3rd parties exist, or have different ideas than Dems.

              If I MUST discuss them I would say the only actual criticism I have (omg toxicity warning) is that they only crop up, and only vocalize in popular spaces right around general elections. They need to build their platform and messaging NOW and for the next several years with the intensity and visibility they do in August-november of a general election year. Their mission and goals would be more effectively achieved

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                It’s not toxicity to make an observation on forces that drove voters to not vote for harris.

                To the first point I made. There is 0 evidence for this what-so-ever. This is just something you are making up to support a narrative. You have not even the suggestion of evidence to back this statement up.

                The toxicity is a culture looking for punching bags rather than showing real introspection. Third parties were utterly irrelevant, and most of the “conversation” around them, were deeply toxic Blue-Maggots blaming them in advance for Harris’s yet-to-be-failed election. I mean, its the definition of the thread we’re in. Its what the comic is about.

                Its literally absurdist. Everything you’ve said, the comic, the entire cult that you are a part of: its in direct opposition to all of the evidence we have.

                And thats why I’m making these points, not because I expect to convince you, but because its important to put your, now obviously detached from reality, toxic approach to rhetoric, on display.

                The blaming of third parties, or anti-war voters, or Muslims, or whichever punching down group you want to single out, on behalf of a Democratic party so severely detached from its own base, is the definition of Blue-MAGA behavior, and it lost the Democrats the 2024 election. Its all on tape. We’ve got it on record. Blue MAGA was told what the consequences of their rhetoric would be while they were doing it, so they can’t pretend to be naive to the consequences we all now have to experience because of their stupendous arrogance.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  What? Single issue voters absolutely were important … Gaza for one.

                  I’m not fucking talking about 3rd party candidates or platforms, my God

                  Edit ultimately introspection comes second because this was a “vote for bad or worse” election and no matter the cause, no matter if you think someone or bluemaga or the moon is to blame, folks rolled the dice instead of avoiding trump. It’s not victimizing to discuss that decisions have consequences.

                  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I just want you to know how much I appreciate you continuously putting on the kind of behavior I’m trying to describe on display. Its going to make an easily accessible record for future generations to develop an understanding both why and how the Democratic party, their voices in media, and their sycophants in forums and on social media sacrificed the project of western Democracy for a self-serving circle jerk to avoid personal accountability for the obvious and inevitable consequences of their actions.