I want to get into the Star Trek universe but dont know where to start. I have previously seen first three seasons of Disocvery and first season of picard. Picard was cool but disocvery didnt quite track, a little boring and not adventure focused enough. However loving lower decks now (just started season 4) and want to get into the more canon stuff.

I have access to TNG, DS9, Voyager, Enterprise and SNW. TOS i could probanly get access to if i want, but gotta admit that is not very enticing.

So where to start? TNG?

If it helps (and i dont get shunned for this), i am a stargate guy and love especially sg-1 and the adventure of the week format and the character ensemble

  • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    Voyager’s got that family feel with the cast that you just enjoy being around.

    TNG is best to start after season 1. Not saying season one is bad, but it might be harder to get into for a new comer.

    Enterprise is good is you like your uniforms tight.

    The original series is great to get a lot of the origin information. I guess it’s hard for new comers, but I grew up with it, so has a special accepting place in my heart.

    Deep Space 9 is my personal favorite for political sci-fi. However, there is the occasional whatever episode. This is best to watch is order all the way through.

    I still think that lower decks and strange new worlds can not be fully enjoyed without some other older trek shown under your belt, but it’s only a few episodes so you can finish them both quickly.

    I abandoned Discovery after season 2 or 3 (I forget) I hear it got ok later on, but idk.

    Picard, just watch season 3. I watched the others and then season 3 came out. I forgot about the others.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      TNG is best to start after season 1. Not saying season one is bad, but it might be harder to get into for a new comer.

      i think i am now prepared for what to come and will try to also watch season 1 but with the mindset that i can skip bad episodes.

      I still think that lower decks and strange new worlds can not be fully enjoyed without some other older trek shown under your belt, but it’s only a few episodes so you can finish them both quickly.

      getting much enjoyment out of lower decks now, but i can obviously tell there are many references i dont quite pick up on. If i end up watching it all, i will definitely go back and rewatch lower decks. Good point about few episodes, as i think i will try to squeeze in snw before i start tng-era.

      • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        You’ll be fine, a lot of the shows need to grow, but I think Voyager and DS9 from the gate is pretty solid. However, I agree that DS9 is actually better the more you rewatch. I didn’t care too just for it the first time, but on the second watch 💪

  • EarMaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    My main advice is: Don’t be afraid to skip an episode if you watch it and you don’t like it. Especially the early seasons of TNG, DS9 and Voyager have some episodes which can easily be skipped. You won’t lose any context.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’d start with Strange New Worlds. It’s very classic Trek in terms of its themes and stories, but as it’s still being made it has contemporary audiences in mind. If you like it, I would then go to TNG.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      It absolutely is not. Everyone is snarky with a bad attitude. It leans way too heavily into pseudo-science magical explanations, and it does dumb stuff like showing Vulcans (who only mate once every 7 years) laying around and making out like a couple of teenagers.

      • klemptor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Ugh… I’ve been so reticent to watch modern Trek. I’ve heard such bad things about Discovery and have never been tempted to try it. But I really love the TNG era, so I gave in and watched Picard season 1…man, that was a mistake. Too modern, too snarky, too fucking meta. I swore off modern Trek. But then I read loads of threads saying that SNW was a return to form, and that it felt the most like Star Trek out of all the modern series. So even though I knew I might hate it, yesterday I watched the first three episodes. I’m already so annoyed with it. Super meta, the cast is for the most part way too young, and it’s loose or completely disregarding toward canon (yeah, Spock and T’Pring having sex without Pon Farr… give me a break!), and plotlines that make no sense at all. I’m so annoyed with it. I get that '80s/'90s TV was too earnest for today’s audiences, but SNW feels like a parody of Star Trek, not a worthy successor. So far, nothing feels like actual high stakes. There really isn’t serious drama that I actually care about. When shows are too snarky and meta, it makes it really hard for me to connect with them.

        I do recognize that first seasons can be rocky, so I’ll at least stick with it through the end of the season. But I can’t lie, it’s off to a terrible start. I wish we could have shows more in keeping with the tone and themes of TNG and DS9 (or even Voyager!).

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          I watched Picard too, based on the advice of a friend. It started out seeming pretty promising, and just kept getting worse, all the way to the end.

          It’s not actually Star Trek, but the Orville is the best Trek that has been made since DS9. It starts pretty campy and stupid, but it gets really good! They back off the jokes and goofiness, and start making an impactful show after a few episodes. I may have fast forwarded through parts of episode two, but I’m so glad that I stuck with the show. You sound like your tastes align with mine, and I highly advise watching The Orville, and giving it a chance to find its footing.

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            Ooh yeah I’ve heard people speak highly of The Orville, and I keep forgetting to check it out! If I’m not mistaken, it’s got Penny Johnson (Kasidy Yates) in it, right?

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Agreed. I watch SNW when new episodes air, but it’s the one Trek show I’m never tempted to rewatch. It’s basically overengineered fan fiction.

  • jerakor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Start with the best episodic episodes of TNG and DS9. Most of us were introduced to Star Trek out of order, it isnt like modern TV. 90s TV and prior was focused on syndication.

    My recommendations would be, TNG: Darmok, Tapestry, The Wounded, Inner Light, Cause and Effect, Lower Decks (The episode that inspired the show). For DS9: In The Pale Moonlight, Duet, Trials and Tribbleations, The Visitor (Rest in peace Tony Todd)

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Thanks for the list! I think it will be either this or try to watch TNG from the start and follow the 90s shows. But SNW first is still a contender

      Btw what do you mean by syndication?

      • jerakor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        Syndication is also called reruns, when the show is rerun out of order on TV at a standard Timeslot. Like for me TNG was on every night at 7pm M-F. It was shown in random order as far as I know with I believe them skipping less popular episodes, I honestly never noticed if they did hits for a bit then did a rerun through it or what.

        The first season of TNG is considered weak as a heads up, similar for DS9 though DS9 has some bangers in S1, TNG is mostly weak. That said if you like it, you’ll LOVE the rest.

        SNW is fantastic and I really recommend it, it is certainly New Trek but it’s a MUCH better successor to the legacy than Discovery.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I recommend starting with the original series or Star Trek the next generation. Picard and Discovery are probably the worst places to start.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think Discovery being modern and (mostly) a prequel is a good place to start. It also is a good into to SNW for obvious reasons.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Hehe yea, i can see that - never saw season 2 of Picard which i heard is completely bonkers? I think tos will be a little too old for me, but it seems i will probably check out tng first. Just gotta decide if i wanna jump around like some suggested or just force my way throguh the first seasons

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    Since you’re into Lower Decks, I dare you to just follow the episode annotations and canon connection published here and use those as your guide to Star Trek. Every episode of LDS is so full of references to older episodes across different series, that might be a fun way to experience the canon 🙂

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Thats a fun idea! If i knew about this before it would have been cool to do it in parallel from the start. I think i at the very least will definitely aim to go through LD again after having seen through 90s stuff if i ever get that far to pick up on the references!

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        Even if you’ve watched some or all of the old shows in order, I think it could be fun to do a casual rewatch by LDS references. It gives you reason to watch some deep cuts out of context, and probably not the ones you’d be inclined to pick on your own 🙂

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    You dare defile Lower Decks by calling other stuff “More cannon”! Experience bij, petaQ! 😉

    In all seriousness, though, I would say DS9. The first season is much better than TNG season 1 in my opinion - not perfect, but livable. It mostly gets better from there, though like VOY, be prepared for sudden urges for Rick Berman to “accidentally fall out an airlock”, if you know what I mean.

    This might be tinted by DS9 being my favorite Trek series, although Lower Decks is putting up fierce competition for DS9’s top spot in my heart.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      hehe i at least assumed the more comedic aspects does not fit into the true star trek lore :p I think i have settled on starting from TNG and moving onto DS9 from there. Still considering SNW first since its not that many episodes.

      be prepared for sudden urges for Rick Berman to “accidentally fall out an airlock”, if you know what I mean.

      not really but it sounds like some soviet putin stuff!

      • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        After watching other Star Trek shows, you’ll find the true beauty is the vast majority of Lower Decks completely fits into canon, as “the true Star Trek lore” contains some ridiculous stuff.

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 days ago

    Since you’ve already watched the relevant parts of Discovery, I’d recommend SNW. It spins off directly from Disco season 2, but it’s more episodic and has a wider tonal range. Some episodes are dark and serious, some are plain goofy. Overall you’ll find it much more light hearted and adventurous than Disco.

    Otherwise, I’m a big supporter of starting at the beginning. Give a few episodes of TOS a try. Yes, it’s a product of it’s time, but it still holds up as great TV. It’s also one of the few Trek shows that really hits the ground running quality wise - the '90s series tend to take a few seasons to rev up.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Episodic is good!

      Im prepared for slow start with TNG-era stuff, not sure if im prepared for TOS. But checking out a few episodes camt hurt, i guess i for some reason think i have to commit to one series from start to end and that is obviously not true

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yeah, definitely not. Picard and Discovery were very serialised, as were the later seasons of DS9, but outside of those you can pretty much dip your toe in to almost any episode and not worry about getting sucked into a whole arc. It’s probably best to keep a low-commitment mindset and skip around a bit until something really works for you.

  • PassingDuchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Echoing move to SNW. It has a higher budget than older Trek and follows the current trend of “mini-series” storytelling. Older Trek follows older TV rules (wanted 26 eps to a season so a lot of filler to make it so). DS9 would be my other rec with a heavy caveat that if you’re not feeling an ep skip it and look it up on memory alpha later, particularly for the first season. As it goes on it gets more into the long form storytelling you’d expect with today’s shows, but first few seasons can be a bit rough and there can be a long time between plots being revisited (but when they are they make it count). TNG, Voyager and TOS are mainly monster/problem of the week (Voyager kind of weakly straddles longform and episodic leaning heavily towards episodic). Out of them I’d recommend TNG outside of the first two seasons (first season is TOS scifi tales encore, second season I actually like a lot and has some good eps, but general like is a minority opinion and cast gets retooled in third season anyway).

    If you don’t mind kids shows also recommend Prodigy (kinda like a Trek ATLA imo).

  • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    TNG from the start, but Iimit yourself to the 4 or 5 best rated episodes from Season 1 and 2. Then crack on with most of 3 and 4. 5 onwards starts to have a few more clunkers but by then you should have a good idea if you like it enough to take a chance.

  • Karabola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    TOS is very dated and can be hard to watch at times. You definitely have to be appreciative of the camp and low production.

    TNG holds up a bit better. It’s not an adventure show though, and the first season has some real stinkers. I’d say it’s a good starting point to watch the first 3 or 4 episodes then go to season 2 weeks give that a shot. If you like how it’s going then go back and finish S1 and keep going.

    DS9 is like tng but also has a bit more edge and does some good deconstruction of the pure optimism of tng. It is still optimistic but also has some cynicism I love it. I don’t think I’d like it as much without a good tng backbone though.

    Overall 90s trek isn’t going to really give you a lot of adventure focus, unless you watch the movies. It’s strengths lie in the morality play and the collaborative problem solving, and the idea of a bright future. Picard kind of shits all over that idea of a brighter future but to each their own, I can see why some people would like it.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think ill reserve TOS for if i become a trekkie! Hehe

      I definitely need some of that brighter future-stuff right about now. I think what i mean with adventure of the week i mean problem of the week. It doesnt have to be jungles and temples and stuff. But i dont want that hbo-style “oh we are so dark and you have to pay attention for every fucking second of every episode or you will lose the thread because we are so intrcate and did i mention we are dark now fuck off and get depressed”

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I’ll throw my hat in for starting with DS9. I’m just finishing the final season with my partner now - her first watch - and it’s really cemented why its my favourite Trek. It holds up incredibly well.

  • Hugin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    TNG season 3. The first two sessions are pretty rough. Start with 3. If you ever do a rewatch then try starting with season 1. Then try DS9.

    TOS is good if you can handle the very low budget look.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I started with Picard then Strange New Worlds then Discovery.

    I’ll take my downvotes and death threats now.

    • Cole@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      No downvotes or death threats from me! Start however you want or it happens to start! I started by watching TNG on air with my Dad as a kid, which is probably why I like the 90s shows so much. I’m really not sure how younger people find an entry point into the older shows because they just don’t have the same feel as the newer shows, IMHO, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t enjoy them.

      I watched Picard and enjoyed it. I probably will never rewatch it like TNG, but it was a fun distraction. I’m glad others are enjoying it.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        On Reddit way back when, I joined a trek sub as I’ve wanted to get into Star Trek but found the 90s shows too dry (early 2000s video games however, 👌). Posted about how I was really enjoying Picard and got RIPPED to shreds in the comments. No actual death threats but a bunch of people called me intellectually challenged and one combed through my post history to point out why exactly I was so cognitively bankrupt haha

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        More! I watched Lower Decks which was a fun spin on the whole thing and I’m making my way through Discovery still.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Y’know we see so many old “fans” going out of their way to shit on the post-2005 stuff it’s nice to see people who got into it through the new shows!