• dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not 100% sure but I don’t think anything would stop either a fork or a new app that uses the same protocol.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There are a million ways open platforms can be undermined, especially when serious money stands to be gained from it. See basically all of human history as exhibit A…

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          yes, see this thread

          https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113487613965056474

          “#BlueSky isn’t decentralised or federated. The outage yesterday is the obvious proof. It may look decentralised and they definitely love to outsource traffic and storage costs by claiming that running your own PDS (Personal Data Server) is somehow something federated, but that’s all smoke and mirrors. You have to go deep on [1] to find “networking through Relays instead of server-to-server” as their current implementation choice. THEY run the relays. No one else.”

            • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              You can run your own relay, in that sense the “body” of bluesky is when considered in the abstract potentially decentralized… but when you consider the “brain” of bluesky nodes and the layer of moderation and post/commenting is still locked into a centralized system it is a bit like arguing borg drones have free will because they are physically individual beings.

              Or it is like arguing an ant isn’t existentially dependent upon the structure of the ant colony to survive since each ant posesses an individual body with its own six legs.