• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    13 days ago

    According to the document, Keighin sent a letter to Nintendo in late October “bragging that he has ‘a thousand recorded channels’ to stream” and that he will continue to use them.

    Don’t think he was intimidated

    • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      13 days ago

      Except they know his real name and his face, that kind of threat doesn’t work when they can just tell your country to arrest you for breaking the law.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 days ago

        that kind of threat doesn’t work when they can just tell your country to arrest you for breaking the law.

        That assumes the country gives a shit. Many countries simply do not care about what Intellectual Property you “own” or created in some other country.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          But then those sorts of countries usually have law enforcement that likes taking large amounts of “financial incentives” to do whatever a company like Nintendo wants them to do.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m not sure that Nintendo has any pull in any Middle Eastern country or China.

            But all of this is moot as the lawsuit is in the US… And Nintendo would just tell the streaming services to ban them over and over again.

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        The key here is $152.500 per infringement. So if he streamed at least 50 times in the past two years, that’s $76 million at least.

        And that falls straight back into “normalcy” (for Nintendo).

          • .Donuts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Follow the source of this article (in this case Polygon, yuck) and you will find the original info:

            It’s seeking $150,000 for each alleged violation of Nintendo’s rights outlined in the Copyright Act and $2,500 for each alleged violation of the Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention and anti-trafficking provisions. Alternatively, Nintendo also could elect to take “actual damages,” i.e. money it’s lost, and Keighin’s profits, “in amounts to be proven at trial.”