I know this might start war in the comments so please chill people, I don’t want to get 20 reports from this single post.

  • groet@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    You didn’t read the article did you? Its not about the inclusion of a character, but about how a specific scene with that character is handled. The author claims it is completely jarring, doesn’t fit into the games setting and doesn’t even use the games existing lore for transgender people but instead uses modern terminology.

    I found the article to very informative and not at all “gamergatey”.

    Its points are:

    • this is the scene
    • it is bad
    • here is exelent trans representation in a fantasy setting
    • “its a BioWare self insert”
    • this is how they could have handled it better
    • the game is great, but now everybody will just talk about woke, so again the game is good
    • Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Every time I say the horseshoe theory is stupid I open a forum and am proven wrong…

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            17 days ago

            Lol. The admonishment for “misusing” gamergate by citing horseshoe theory as if it’s in any way applicable is hilariously on point. Good luck with that “enlightened” centrism.

            • Doburoku@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              It’s ok to be wrong. It’s how we grow. Being right all the time is boring and delusional.

              • Ech@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                17 days ago

                Arguing a single point ≠ claiming to be “right all the time”. What’s your next condescending bit of “advice” that’s totally not a poorly disguised character attack?

            • Viri4thus@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              What centrism? Calling out the bourgeoisie invented themes to distract from the class struggles is the duty of every reasonable person, more so if they are on the left. Human rights are not debatable, you vote for the representative that abides human rights. If none is available, you start a revolution. What you don’t do is use a neoliberal dear to proselytise as if you’re not part of the problem by perpetuating the system that abuses the people you’re soapboxing about. (you, as in, Bioware, not you, this is not meant as a personal attack, I came to lemmy to talk to reasonable people)

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      17 days ago

      Its not about the inclusion of a character, but about how a specific scene with that character is handled.

      You didn’t read my comment, did you? Like the part where I specifically mention that? I don’t care if the scene was shot on a camcorder for a student created after-school special on a PTA budget. Acting like that’s the problem instead of any of the reactionary bullshit to it is not the viewpoint of someone who truly cares about these populations. Where’s the “helpful” article about shitty hetero romance scenes in countless movies/shows/games and how we should do better there? Those don’t cause a blip. But this? This is a “problem”. Fuck that.

      and doesn’t even use the games existing lore for transgender people but instead uses modern terminology.

      This reads like those losers that rage about black people in The Witcher because it’s “noT hIStoRIcaLlY AccuRAtE”. Bemoaning “modern terminology” is so pointless. They’re also speaking modern languages through the majority of the game. Gonna write a Forbes “article” about that, too?