Candace Fails screamed for someone in the Texas hospital to help her pregnant daughter. “Do something,” she pleaded, on the morning of Oct. 29, 2023.

Nevaeh Crain was crying in pain, too weak to walk, blood staining her thighs. Feverish and vomiting the day of her baby shower, the 18-year-old had gone to two different emergency rooms within 12 hours, returning home each time worse than before.

The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.

Now on Crain’s third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to “confirm fetal demise,” a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care.

By then, more than two hours after her arrival, Crain’s blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were “blue and dusky.” Her organs began failing.

Hours later, she was dead.

Fails, who would have seen her daughter turn 20 this Friday, still cannot understand why Crain’s emergency was not treated like an emergency.

But that is what many pregnant women are now facing in states with strict abortion bans, doctors and lawyers have told ProPublica.

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Is there a database that collects these cases? I’m not from the US, but I think it would make a lot of sense to have a website that documents all those cases, so one could point people to it if necessary.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      20 days ago

      I imagine it would be a HIPAA violation for hospitals to release these details; you only hear about the ones that the individual families decide to make public by speaking to journalists…

      …so it’s even worse/more common than you think.

  • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    That’ll teach those sinful women for daring to have sex without their owners’ permission. Even stuff like this won’t sway the committed republicunts since they can fall back on some bullshit about “god’s plan” or find ways to turn it back on the victims of their politics.

  • Potatisen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 days ago

    Fuuuuu, imagine dying like this. That poor girl.

    The absolute terror she must’ve had in her mind, while being in a hospital too. The place that should help her, just feeling absolutely powerless and probably begging for help while life is slipping away. Imagine what she sees in the faces of the people she’s asking for help from.

    Terrifying.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 days ago

    Sad thing is that these stories don’t seem to get in front of the people who need to hear them. The media censorship in right wing media is as aggressive as the media censorship that they think exists in traditional media outlets.

    • slingstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      These same people see school shootings and just think kids dying is the price for their right to bear arms, and they don’t care. I don’t think many of them have the conscience left in their empty Godless souls to care about women dying needlessly if it means their doctrinal nonsense can be imposed on everyone.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Even If it did… They don’t care, it’s all pretending. But if a MAN would die? Oh that would be intolerable!

    • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Right wing media convinces their viewers that any media which conflicts with their viewpoint is fake news. This perspective is super alarming because it makes it super hard to construct an argument when every set of proof is considered a lie and propaganda.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Where were all the pro-lifers? Oh, that’s right, they only care about you before birth. My mistake.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      20 days ago

      Literally just had an argument with a born again Christian who didn’t want tampons in bathrooms… because tax payers would have to pay and it was the parents responsibility

      This guy though has no problem with collecting the pension from tax payers or the church not paying tax.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        So he’s fine if we remove all toilet paper from bathrooms. How he wipes his ass is his parent’s responsibility right?

        • auzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Funny you mention that, because that’s actually the argument I brought up.

          Even better , toilet paper is stored in the dirtiest part of the bathroom. Tampons they can store at the sinks

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 days ago

    Any “pro-life” fuckheads want to speak up here? This is the inevitable result of laws criminalizing healthcare. The doctors could not act without risking criminal prosecution in Texas and this young woman died. Or maybe killing women was the goal all along? Solving Texas’ teen pregnancy problem one dead teen at a time.

    • AliSaket@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Hate to be that guy, but it is also the present (hopefully not future) the Democrats have allowed Republicans to build:

      Bill Clinton promised to codify Roe v. Wade into law. He didn’t.

      Obama promised to codify Roe v. Wade into law. He didn’t despite having a super-majority in his first two years.

      Biden promised to codify Roe v. Wade into law and didn’t. The Dobbs decision was taken in June 2022, so before the midterms when Democrats still had a simple majority in the house and a tie + VP in the senate. When there were rumors/leaks a month or so before the decision that the USSC would take that decision soon. Again: Inaction.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Reagan gets the blame for 9/11 by not passing Federal laws that help to keep hijackers off of planes.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yes, they had many chances and failed. But these new laws are NOT anyone’s fault but republicans.

        • AliSaket@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          They didn’t fail. They didn’t even try. Not even with a super-majority.

          I am sick of such important issues like health of people, let alone half the population, being used as mere strategic play. So please push them to do the right thing, after they’re elected. They don’t seem to respond without pressure.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’m sure you’re more politically astute than Obama or Pelosi but even with a supermajority Roe v. Wade wasn’t predicted to be murdered under the administration of a russian plant who spiked FBI investigations into the corrupt justices the republiQan controlled Senate waved through after they lied and claimed they though of Roe as settled law.

            Democrats are absolutely to blame for not fighting harder, absolutely, but overturning Roe was not supposed to get any support much less 75% of all republiQan women who have had multiple opportunities to oppose it and do not. If one is to legislate like one should many, many, many things would need to change.

            My point being it’s not as simple as you make it. And when people jump to “yeah but Democrats are to blame” I know we’re usually already in Bad Faithville. Both Sides and all that. NO.

            • AliSaket@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              And when people jump to “yeah but Democrats are to blame” I know we’re usually already in Bad Faithville. Both Sides and all that.

              Just no. This is not about both sides in any shape way or form. This is about agency. Fact is: There were ways to do this and the last three Democratic presidents (including the sitting president) have campaigned and outlined plans to codify it into law and didn’t. Yes it may have taken people by surprise that the country and the world is regressing as early and fast as it is, but that doesn’t take away agency, especially when they didn’t even try to spring to action after mere lip service to garner votes.

              The thing is: The conservative, religious right, openly formulated and has been following their plan of judicial activism for decades. The lower courts haven’t become this biased towards Republican policy over night. It was due to bad luck, bad faith acting of McConnel and the other Republican senators and stubberness of some involved people on the other side of the aisle that Trump was able to nominate this many people to the USSC. It would have happened at some point.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 days ago

    “Doctors involved in Crain’s care did not respond to several requests for comment. The two hospitals, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas and Christus Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth, declined to answer detailed lists of questions about her treatment.”

    The predominance of religion-owned hospitals in large swaths of the country is part of the anti-autonomy strategy. When I wanted my tubes tied along with my second C-section, I had a choice of the university-affiliated hospital rather than the Catholic one which wouldn’t perform a tubal ligation. But in many places, there’s no such option, especially in an emergency.

    • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Those two in particular are in Beaumont, a particularly ass-backwards area of the state. One of its satellite cities, Vidor, is talked about even in Texas as being vitriolic in their racism. I’ve also been inside both of those hospitals’ emergency rooms, and wouldn’t want to be there if my life depended on it.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    We all predicted this would happen because we have a basic understanding of the world and a smidge of empathy. Unlike Republicans.

  • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Does anyone remember from the handmaids tail where the one handmaids loses her shit and shoots a guard and I think aunt Lydia? So they put her in a coma and keep her alive for her womb? And she wasn’t the patient, the baby was?

    Yeah.