Background

I have had the same Kingston DataTraveller DTSE9 since around 2010, when I was still in school. I’ve carried it on my keychain for at least 12 years and it still works, its “the old reliable”.

That said, it’s slow. Very slow. I use it mostly as a boot USB for Linux / Windows, so I need several sticks with decent random read speed, and decent write speed for when I update them.

My criteria were:

  • All-metal construction for durability, including the keychain loop
  • Sits well on a keychain next to keys
  • Reasonable speed, including random reads.

Testing method

I evaluated the sticks in two ways.

I ran CrystalDiskMark with 256 MiB (x5) configuration.

I also measured the angle at which the USB stick sits on a keyring. I found that several of them could not sit perpendicular to a keyring it because of their geometry, which makes it difficult to comfortably use them next to keys.

At the datum of 0 degrees, the key sits perpendicular to the keyring.

Results

The competitors

Here are the 6 main competitors in this space I bought.

All transfer units are in MB/s.

Product Price (£) Angle on keyring (0deg is best) Sequential reads Q8T1 Sequential reads Q1T1 Random reads Q32T1 Random reads Q1T1 Sequential writes Q8T1 Sequential writes Q1T1 Random writes Q32T1 Random writes Q1T1
Corsair GTX 128GB 65 (256GB version) 0 470.214 429.330 157.436 19.390 436.990 414.201 166.829 38.937
Samsung Bar 64GB 10 55 305.424 305.268 14.517 13.428 36.434 36.247 20.537 21.619
Kingston DTSE9G3 64GB 11 0 246.705 244.496 13.756 13.028 100.236 110.054 0.484 0.474
Integral Arc 3 10 0 162.336 161.338 15.567 11.188 49.457 47.965 5.032 4.244
Kingston DataTraveller Micro 64GB 11 0 247.000 245.247 13.788 12.961 100.932 101.292 0.496 0.470
Sandisk Ultra Luxe 64GB 12 25 403.863 399.974 12.438 12.054 91.835 91.685 4.272 4.258

Some additional notes:

  • The Samsung Bar had really sharp corners. You might need to file them down like I did.
  • Corsair GTX: the 128GB version is no longer available and the lowest capacity is 256GB. It’s more of a portable SSD in the form of a USB stick, which makes it really fast, but it’s bulkier than a normal USB stick, though not by much. Often it takes up more than one USB port because it’s wide. It’s still very good and I recommend it.

Other devices

Some related products I own but don’t qualify for this comparison but are offered up here for context.

Here’s why they don’t qualify.

  • Crucial P3 Plus: It’s an NVME SSD. Can be made portable with a good enclosure, but too bulky for what I’m looking for.

  • Samsung 860 Evo: It’s a SATA SSD, definitely not the right form factor.

  • Sandisk Ultra Curve: I bought this thinking it was made out of metal, but it was not. It’s fairly flimsy plastic.

  • Kingston DTSE9 16GB: This is my old stick. The old reliable. No longer sold, but I’ve tested its successor.

  • Samsung SD Card: It’s a 2016 MicroSD card connected to my PC via a MicroSD-SD adapter and a USB card reader. I included this as a meme.

Product Sequential reads Q8T1 Sequential reads Q1T1 Random reads Q32T1 Random reads Q1T1 Sequential writes Q8T1 Sequential writes Q1T1 Random writes Q32T1 Random writes Q1T1
Crucial P3 Plus M.2 NVME 2TB 1598.227 1332.131 305.220 46.643 1560.989 1452.256 238.134 102.502
Samsung 860 Evo SATA 1TB 564.446 539.913 272.631 43.322 536.440 518.168 238.752 101.313
Sandisk Ultra Curve 160.091 158.859 9.271 9.043 58.680 60.377 2.902 3.209
Old Kingston DTSE9 16GB 18.452 18.220 8.473 8.096 13.626 13.629 0.115 0.026
Samsung Memory Pro Plus Micro SD Card 20.765 20.969 5.146 5.102 19.493 20.316 2.181 3.421

Conclusion

There are no clear winners in this fight.

  • The Corsair GTX is the fastest in all categories by a country mile, but has a larger form-factor than other entries and higher price. Very good, but not for everyone.
  • Samsung Bar has the fastest random writes, and decent performance in other metrics for its USB stick form factor, but sits awful on a keychain due to the angled hole.
  • The Integral Arc 3 has solid random performance, but worst sequential performance than the rest.
  • Sandisk Ultra Luxe gets the best overall balance of performance, but does not sit on the keychain super well.
  • The two Kingston’s perform effectively the same, with the Micro being much more compact. That said, that can be a disadvantage on a keyring if there are adjacent items.
  • All competitors (bar the GTX) had similar random reads.

For me, I’d say the right choice is either the Kingston DTSE9G3. It’s a nice upgrade over my old DTSE9 and sits nicely next to it’s grandfather. If I needed any random writes though, for copying lots of small documents like code files, I’d pick the Integral Arc 3.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good review, it reminds me of a Project Farm video. That guy reviews things very much from a practical use standpoint.

  • sinceasdf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thanks, I wish more people did their own tests and published them like this since marketing for electronics is loose at best

    • smort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, about the only place I trust for electronics reviews is rtings, and usually consumer reports for household appliances. Everywhere else seems infected by the affiliate bug

  • Mac@federation.red
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really wish Kingston made their latest datatraveler drive in all-metal. The USB C one seems to just be an Nvme drive with a USB C port.

  • Jawa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I also have a DTSE9 and it’s been on my keychain for at least 10 years now :D

    Recently I have just gotten 2 nvme ssd enclosures and have been very happily using them for the super quick image writes. I just checked if there’s some compact 2230 enclosures and some of those even have keychain attachment points… they definitely are a bit bulky for a keychain but I’d argue they still are an option and will look similar to a keyfob :)

  • craigers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Love the thorough report. I also have an Ole reliable from circa 2008. Never fails, slow as balls.

  • thinkyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    you should check out the kingston SE9 G2. It has a smaller loop end and so it works way better on a keychain. unfortunately they didn’t keep the feature for the G3.

    picture Amazon Link

  • mrmule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why only usb-a?.. Is that all that’s on offer? Surely a Usb-c would be faster and smaller?

    • terminhell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Still a ton of devices with no c port. Even if op went that route they’d likely have to keep an adapter around too. I recently picked up a hybrid A/C drive. Using the C port side always feels like it’s gonna just snap off lol.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        My company uses SFF PCs with only a single front USB-C port and plugs a 2/4 port serial adapter into it for all locations. If everyone around it is careful, fine. But I can absolutely attest that USB-A is much more sturdy and secure, at the cost of slightly larger form factor…

  • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Very cool! Thanks for sharing.

    Just a thought on random write: If you are using swap/page files, it may have more of an impact. Or if you are updating the system in place.
    I have no clue whether updating by flashing a new system image would be treated as sequential or extracted randomly as individual files.

    • Armand1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      When you boot from a USB, it’s usually read-only, so I figured random writes wouldn’t be super important.

      I’m hoping that flashing a new image is mostly sequential, but I might do a quick test with Rufus if you’re interested.

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Have you come across a USB c only key that would be compact? Like just a stick the width of the USB c port

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have a metal dual USB A & C microSD card reader on my keychain. It lets me swap out cards easily, and should it ever be damaged, the chances are slimmer that the tiny microSD will be destroyed.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is awesome. I think I need to get a Corsair. And looks like I can probably use it for self defense too.