• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does this mean “AI was used as a fancy autocomplete”? Because that’s my number 1 use case for AI like copilot, and if that’s the case, over 25% of my code is written by AI. But let me tell you, it still gets it wrong, repeatedly making the same syntax errors no matter how many times I correct it. It starts to get it right, then later reverts to making the same syntax errors, even making up variable names that violate widely known public APIs.

    • prof@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agreed. It’s really shit for new code, but if I’m writing glue code stuff or repetitive code it saves a lot of time spent on typing.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Auto complete is about… 60% helpful and increases my productivity with about 5-10% as I need to double check everything it does and half the time it’s something ridiculously stoopid