They say that GNU is spreading misinformation and “stop getting info from charlatans”?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You deleted your last post on a similar topic, which had some excellent discussion and comments, and now all of that good content for lemmy is gone.

    Deleting posts is not great for the community.

  • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think we need uncompromising people in this world. Doesn’t mean we have to listen or follow everything they say though. Those are my thoughts on GNU.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Way to distract from otherwise good argument about firmware. Really dumb take. In case you think I’m being flippant, let me present an alternative blob:

    GNU are striving for the ideal goal of fully open source hardware and software. Their statement correctly highlights the compromises of the reality of using proprietary hardware which requires proprietary firmware; compounded by the reality of oligopolies maintaining their market positions via proprietary software. Our take is that providing an otherwise open source OS within this reality is significantly better for people than letting full corporate control reign until open mobile hardware becomes practical and common, if it ever does.

  • ramenu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not a fan of GrapheneOS, but the point they bring up here is valid. There is already proprietary firmware on your computer. There’s no reason why you shouldn’t be updating it to protect yourself from serious exploits. The FSF takes an ideological stance rather than a practical one, unfortunately.