• Logi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You really should read the article. The hypothesis is that global emissions peaked last year and so the cumulative emissions graph that you’re focusing on would start to curve downward this year or maybe next. We’ll “see by the end of the year”.

    Again, in the article, things are changing wildly fast and you won’t see that yet in a lagging indicator like cumulative CO₂.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Until that graph curves over, it isn’t true.

      Evidence trumps wishes and fantasies and wild guesses. I refuse to get ensnared by hopium, especially when the hard evidence isn’t even in yet.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The worst effects of climate change haven’t happened yet so I guess that isn’t true either and you’ll go off at anyone who’ll attempt to use the best available information and modelling to predict that.