• BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is a slight complexity to this as methane breaks down into CO2 over a period of about 20 years, in the meantime it contributes a higher warming effect. But there is a measure called CO2e which is the equivalent including the other green house gases and it too has been accelerating so it doesn’t change the point its just there are some prior emission impacts on current CO2 in the atmosphere.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      and it too has been accelerating so it doesn’t change the point its just there are some prior emission impacts

      Say you don’t understand emissions measuring without actually saying you don’t understand emissions measuring.

      Past emissions only place emissions up to a value. Current emissions are what determine whether our emissions output is continuing to accelerate, or are actually slowing down.

      And yesterday’s emissions continue to be smaller than today’s emissions. That is why it’s called accelerating emissions.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And yesterday’s emissions continue to be smaller than today’s emissions. That is why it’s called accelerating emissions.

        Not necessarily true. According to the article, it’s quite possible that yesterday’s emissions are the same as today’s emissions. Meaning, we’ve stopped increasing emissions.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Until that graph curves over, it isn’t true.

          Evidence trumps wishes and fantasies. I refuse to get ensnared by hopium.