"… Researchers are hoping to do that now that they have a new map — the most complete for any organism so far — of the brain of a single fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). The wiring diagram, or ‘connectome’, includes nearly 140,000 neurons and captures more than 54.5 million synapses, which are the connections between nerve cells.

… The map is described in a package of nine papers about the data published in Nature today. Its creators are part of a consortium known as FlyWire, co-led by neuroscientists Mala Murthy and Sebastian Seung at Princeton University in New Jersey."

See the associated Nature collection: The FlyWire connectome: neuronal wiring diagram of a complete fly brain, which also has links to the nine papers

All nine papers are open access!

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So can we model this now?

    Can we use this data to essentially emulate a fruit fly’s behavioral patterns?

    Like can we just wire this up in a software neural network, feed it some inputs, and see what happens?

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As far as I understand, not really, as neural networks are more of a metaphor than an analogue. They don’t have a one to one correspondence to brain neuron behavior.

  • Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The team was surprised by some of the ways in which the various cells connect to one another, too. For instance, neurons that were thought to be involved in just one sensory wiring circuit, such as a visual pathway, tended to receive cues from multiple senses, including hearing and touch1. “It’s astounding how interconnected the brain is,” Murthy says.

    Could this explain synesthesia better or any other similar condition(?)?

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well there is a phenomenon where your brain will make sound and sight “match up” even when it shouldn’t. Like if you hear and see a basketball bouncing 75 meters away, the sound should have about a 0.25 second delay. But your brain will make you perceive the sound as happening simultaneously with the ball hitting the ground, despite the fact that you could not perceive the visual and auditory sensations simultaneously. If you go further away with the ball, eventually there is a threshold where your start perceiving the delay. The auditory and visual sense would need to be somehow linked for this phenomenon to happen I’d say.

      I guess it’s the brains way of matching visual and auditory cues to try to make a better picture of the world. The brain is basically saying “that sound came from the ball” and you don’t even need to think consciously to know that.