• Bananobanza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, you know, the games are theirs to begin with.

    I see what you mean, and you are correct, but I think it’s more about the games that are being emulated than emulation in itself right?

      • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only time the emulators are targeted is when the creators try to profit off them, or am I mistaken?

          • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yuzu was charging for early access to their emulator, which is what prompted Nintendo action.

            Ryujinx doesn’t seem like any legal action was taken, sounds like the creator was given a chunk of cash by Nintendo to take it down.

            I hate Nintendo, but you gotta keep the facts straight

            • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              They also shut down Yuzu forks using the DMCA. If they paid Ryujinx’s dev it was the equivalent of the Mafia bribing a judge while waving a picture of his family.

            • Zangoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t think they paid him off, I think it was more along the lines of “We won’t do anything to you if you stop now”

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That, and when Nintendo’s code is used in some way to develop the project. Japan has very strict laws on reverse engineering any software, which Nintendo is always set to capitalize on.

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What about the fan games that were made of pure passion for the IP that they’ve taken down?

      To name a few:
      Pokemon Uranium
      Pokemon Prism
      Mario Maker 64
      Another Metroid 2 Remake
      Zelda Maker
      Ocarina of Time 2D
      Zelda 30

      There are countless others I’m sure.

      FUCK Nintendo.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          the fact that its law doesnt necessarily mean the right or moral thing. just means lobbyists might have been paid for it.

          • Magiilaro@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Doesn’t change a thing, Nintendo is bound by law to protect their IPs.

            Why the law is this way and if it should be changed (which it should IMHO) are completely different questions.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              i think we are mostly arguing that it has to be changed when this topic comes up. its not just nintendo and not just games though too.

              • Magiilaro@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yes, like many things in the space of copyright and patents, this should be changed and defanged.

                But the only changes we will ever see is making it more and more into a weapon against consumers. Nintendo, Disney and all the other big IP holders will never allow for anything else, they will use their money and power to prevent it.

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I understand needing to protect your IP, in some sense, but what I’m getting at is that when a fan game is made, it is a homage to a beloved franchise that fosters love for the IP. If you were a smart company, you would foster this love for your franchise, to entrench the fans you already have, and to gather more fans because you are seen as the company that “does no wrong”, which in turn also increases your profits. Imagine if instead of taking these love letters to your franchise down (which makes you look like an absolute fucking ass to most), you made a feature of it on an official channel. Look at Scott Cawthon and his Five Nights at Freddy’s franchise. He encourages people to make fan games using his original ideas and that encourages people to not only love his own games, but to go out and start developing their own little games that include ideas that Scott may not have even thought about including before. I guess what I’m trying to say is that there is a good way of protecting your IP by taking down blatant rip offs of your game that want to steal money from your fans, and cause confusion to new fans. Then there is the bad way, which is taking down these passionate love letters to your franchise that encourage others to look at the original source and see why they even decided to take the time to create the fan game in the first place. IF the fan game is trying to monetize, then by all means, send a warning. Tell them to not monetize it, and they are free to continue. If they continue, Cease and Desist. Hopefully that makes sense.

          • Magiilaro@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If they would carte blanche allow fan games of their IPs then that would weaken the IPs, which could lead to them loosing the IPs completly. For that it is irrelevant if the games are monetized or not.

            Nintendo would need to implement some kind of process for developers of fan games to get them officially licensed. But for that to be effective as a tool to protect the IP they could not just give such a limited fan game license to everyone who request it, so a complex request process with multiple steps would be needed, and they would need to deny lots if not even most of the requests.

            And this gets even more complicated when the very complex japan software patent system is added to the mix.

            Could Nintendo be less shitty? Oh yes they could, but they decided to go the Cobra Kai way and strike first, strike hard, no merci!

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t disagree they are their games, but is it their emulator, or did they just download one of the many online? Really doesn’t matter, just love to see companies bitch about something, then turn around and do it themselves.