• smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What exactly does that mean? I thought you had anti-monopoly laws?

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not a full monopoly. You can choose another ISP, but it’s just that in practice you’d need to physically move to a new location to make that change of vendor.

        • Wolf314159@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why are you bickering with me about it? I don’t appreciate people asking questions in bad faith just so they can make a spicy comment. Think I like it?

          There are choices, it’s just they all suck unless you’re willing to move. Nobody’s arguing that it is a local semi-monopoly.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not the guy you responded to, I’m just pointing out that it is a full monopoly. Which is important because part of the story they sell is that the ability to pay thousands of dollars in moving costs is a reasonable cost of switching providers. We’re never going to get the situation changed if we don’t acknowledge that it’s a full monopoly, complete with rent seeking.